Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
During the history of science and philosophy, many facts have been claimed between scientists and philosophizes, but developing science allows the scientists to evaluate these facts by some experiments and other right information can find it depend on false base, so it needs some modifications. For example, people in Greece believed that the Earth is the center of the world, and all stars and sun rotate around the Earth. However, many sophisticated people found that this claim seems right but with some theories not compatible, so they did not trust some facts to improve their argument.
Using information without any proof and validation through the time can produce some facts base on that facts, so it causes some wrong approach for scientists. Many of scientist make a lot of attempts to create new assertions to improve their field of study, but all their efforts and times dissipated by making these wrong facts to their investigation. Therefore, initially, they must have enough confidence in facts, then investing in these for creating a new approach.
All facts originate from some experiences and some observations to prove that, but a person or people have limitation observations for broadening a perspective to reach fact, even though, they are very attentive for their work. Nevertheless, by elapsed time, many experiments from many people throughout the world would be gathered to reach the best consensus about a fact to be proven aptly. I think people should consider facts as untruthful facts when all ideas and notions clear the fact to validated fact.
All in all, people should consider all facts as a statement which cannot be reliable for proofing some thesis, since many attempts are dissipated, and our instrument and technology are not thoroughly flourished for proving that facts or needing all observations to reach profound fact. Therefore, all parameters mentioned need time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gauravwazza12 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Kutumba kasyap | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Ope Soremekun | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | macropinna | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Roshan Dhakal | 83 | view |
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? 83
- Dancing plays an important role in a culture. 70
- If you had a presentation in a month, would you rather prepare for it from now or would you postpone it to the last days. 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: books are not needed any more because people can read information on computers. 90
- It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people’s behaviour, but legislation cannot reform human nature. Laws cannot change what is in people’s hearts and minds. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'depends'?
Suggestion: depends
...and other right information can find it depend on false base, so it needs some modific...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24429967427 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82864469 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5667752443 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0190289946 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.363636364 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162616379762 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065059984606 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609798728059 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10443887108 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482483838964 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.