In any profession — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In every profession there is a ruler or substantial power to control the realms; every field like, business, politics, education, government and so forth there is one to lead. I agree with the author assertion that the power should put down in every profession after some respect but not specifically five years, because the new descendants will come up with more innovative ideas learning from there precedents and which will help to enhance the realms.
First and foremost, as the gradual change of the time, there pops up some the better ideas for any problem. We can consider that our ancestor used to live their life miserly with lots of tribulations and as the gradual evolution the novel ideas of living life are generated. This in turn, can, serve as the robust evidence for the above claim that, if we give the power to our descendent they will come up with better ideas. Moreover, we should look no further than our technological advancement, in generation of our father or grandfather, there was not even a cellphone to call, but now the cell is ubiquitous. Therefore, it holds the claim firmly that, giving the power to the next generation this will do better progress in every field.
Secondly, it can’t be refuted that the looking the same person in the same field will make the people feel monotonous, people demand change. Likewise, watching the same person ruling the government, the same teacher teaching the student, some entrepreneurs and same business, from ages, will make the people obsessed, rather they want new figures on the respective position. Moreover, the same person will control the area with his same mundane tricks, methods, ideas, principles and so forth of dealing the problem. This idea tantamount to every realms, in politics we demands the new president after they rule with the same principles from years, in business, the same person distributes the same type of product, in education lectures delivers by the same methodology from years.
However, some might think that if the same person subsumed in the respective field will in turn, gain the experience, so that it will furthermore help to flourish the field. But, this will not be beneficial, as we discussed some circumstances above, what might one ruler needs to do is they should share their experiences to their upcoming candidates or the one eligible to their position, edifice their knowledge that they gain after ruling those years, which will help the newcomers to easily deal with it and help boost up the field.
To sum up, the position of ruler of the realms like business, ideas, politics, ideas should be circulated with the few years after the circumstances becomes saturated or monotonous, so that it will help those area to burgeon with the novel ideas, the new comers come up with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'demand'
Suggestion: demand
...tamount to every realms, in politics we demands the new president after they rule with ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... To sum up, the position of ruler of the realms like business, ideas, politic...
^^
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...ted or monotonous, so that it will help those area to burgeon with the novel ideas, the ne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vel ideas, the new comers come up with.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97664543524 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60784967157 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469214437367 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.2870208938 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.428571429 118.986275619 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6428571429 23.4991977007 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161000245229 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595379031064 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591202708736 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109307328065 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722077710345 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.