In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to

Essay topics:

In any profession — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The author claims that every man or women with a position of power should be removed from their seat after five years. This is a compelling argument to which we must examine closely, however, I mostly agree with the stated assumption.

In some cases, it is not a sagacious move to remove someone from power within five years. Especially, those in the zenith of power positions like the President of a country. For example, it is understanding that presidents can serve up to eight years, due to the demand that their role requires. Also, because the transition of moving out of office can be strenuous and slow and it is quite difficult to find candidates with the same amount of experience.

However, as the saying goes “with great power comes great responsibility” so it’s up to the governing bodies and its public to make sure that venality does not arise among its power holders. What better way to preclude this from happening than to shift power every five years? Not only does this serve as a safety mechanism but also prevents a luddite outlook from new candidates that keep up with modern issues. For example, Nevada a small town in Texas has become a polemical town lately due to their representative’s lack of transparent bookkeeping of the citizen’s taxes. The representative has been serving more than fifteen years; however, he did not keep up with the times and refused to go digital. Thus, creating a financial woe among allocated funds in a trail of paper labyrinth. One could argue that this is the people’s fault for not vetting his work, however, in a real-world scenario people are always busy and seldomly do any of us actually look into what our government is doing. We take a leap of faith and accept their promises.

Furthermore, five years is an ample timeframe for a person in power to complete their goals. Yes, one could argue that the wheels of politics/business are slow, but this does not mean they could not put their plan into motion for the next successor to take over. For example, Dallas mayor Ron Kirk made it his goal to improve the infrastructure of the city’s highways, he started the blueprint and left it ready for the new mayor to finish. If the people still are in agreement, they will vote someone in with the same outlook, this is the beauty of having different people in power every five years. In this manner, to say there is not enough time is simply not a valid reason on why to extent the five-year timeframe.

All in all, while in some cases it is beneficial to have a person in power overstay their position, sometimes it is more important to have a safety mechanism in place to ensure that the person knows he or she is on the clock and must make the most of it. This not only creates productivity, but also ensures that new fresh minds are considered also.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...President of a country. For example, it is understanding that presidents can serve up to eight y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...res that new fresh minds are considered also.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.682 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65493578077 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8911048766 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.476190476 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8095238095 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164790072362 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488917442078 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489846147926 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09896438439 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660115206781 0.0667264976115 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...President of a country. For example, it is understanding that presidents can serve up to eight y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...res that new fresh minds are considered also.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.682 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65493578077 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8911048766 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.476190476 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8095238095 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164790072362 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488917442078 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489846147926 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09896438439 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660115206781 0.0667264976115 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.