In any profession business, politics, education, government, those in power should step down after five years.
The author of issue contends that the people who ae in power in any profession should step down after five years. There is a conflict of this claim, while some people are convinced with this claim; others, on the other hand, believe it is not necessary. I generally agree with this claim. Among the countless reasons, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in what follows.
First of all, one should take into account this significant fact that the refreshment of the knowledge, method is a necessity for the success of the occupation. It is evident as a crystal that the successful business or project is one which constructed based upon the latest method and updated information. Besides, the velocity of development of the knowledge and technology is too fast that updated each half decade. On the other hand, the manager of a particular field is not capable of keeping the pace of these alterations. In this case, the requirement of the stepping down from the duty after the five years becomes fundamental fact. A vivid example which can be given to shed light on the issue is the dean of my university's instance. In my university, every four years the dean of the architectural department change. The primary cue of this task is keeping the unit updated toward the latest alteration in the architecture society. As a result, the architecture field in my university is the best-known in my country.
The other striking point justifying my idea is that persist power leads to the misuse of the power. In fact, it is an inherited feature of the human, as people assume they have a sustained power over the people, they initiate to misuse it. This condition can cause to the unfair situations among the workers. Consequently, the order of the organization is distorted. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, approximately, sixty-five percent of the people is eager to use their power in the unfair and anathema situation. For the sake of preventing this catastrophic situation, it is a sound idea to cease this power each five years to remind the governors that their abilities are restricted to these five years, and they do not have that force after that period.
Nevertheless, as far as the reason is concerned, I do not agree with the author is some extents. Each project requires a specific ethnic and order apart from these factors; it can prolong for more than five years to the outcome with the desired aim. In this condition, if a leader provides a detailed and proliferated scheme to achieve this goal, the ceasing among the process will be a simple action. In addition, the organization of the novel method or adaptation of the ongoing order with the new leader is time-consuming. Thereby, it is crucial that the duration of the project should keep in the spotlight till to make a wise decision.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned arguments lead to the conclusion that the based on the length of a project, the manager should be varied since there is a demand to updated awareness and technology, and the prolong power leads to the dictatress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o updated awareness and technology, and the prolong power leads to the dictatress.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'while', 'apart from', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236797274276 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.129471890971 0.157235817809 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0800681431005 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0221465076661 0.0497285424764 45% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0374787052811 0.0444667217837 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132879045997 0.12292977631 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0255536626917 0.0406280797675 63% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84194830667 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0272572402044 0.030933414821 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00511073253833 0.0016655270985 307% => OK
Determiners: 0.177172061329 0.0997080785238 178% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015332197615 0.0249443105267 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00681431005111 0.0148568991511 46% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3106.0 2732.02544248 114% => OK
No of words: 531.0 452.878318584 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84934086629 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.58838876751 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.320150659134 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24670433145 0.280924506359 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173258003766 0.200843997647 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128060263653 0.132149295362 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84194830667 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 219.290929204 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483992467043 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 57.3359224165 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.24 23.380412469 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9522216043 59.4972553346 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.24 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.24 23.380412469 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52 0.674092028746 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 45.910433145 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 2.09009009009 1.64882698954 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115154965676 0.391690518653 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129082212272 0.123202303941 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0748205309431 0.077325440228 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.60965054224 0.547984918172 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128103833361 0.149214159877 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625116477345 0.161403998019 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905754317899 0.0892212321368 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.559364311566 0.385218514788 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0581536746795 0.0692045440612 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993762710573 0.275328986314 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662045876488 0.0653680567796 101% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88274336283 225% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.