In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Progress comes when we are aware of the entire problem as a whole, it’s impact and importance of solving it. All this awareness is difficult to perceive in the correct direction by a single person or group of people having similar view points. So, I agree with the statement given above that progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Firstly, people discussing on an issue with different view points leads to seeing the problem from all the angles. This increases the coverage of the solution we can provide. Two different kinds of solution, when conflated, can possiblity give a better covered solution. We have numerous forums that conduct debates, extempore among people on ongoing issues to get all kinds of ideas. This might lead to coming to a solution which was not at first though by a single unit.
Discussion among people with different viewpoints can potentially uncover pros and cons of different kinds of solution, thus avail the authority with variety of choices from which the he can choose the best. Most of the software companies conduct team meetings, retrospective meetings in order to analyse the problem which they faced from all different perspectives and come up with a robust well covered solution. A better solution to our problems means more progress.
Although, having so many benefits of having discussion among conflicting people, it is very important that, at the end, the conflicting group comes up with a final solution, otherwise it might lead to a never-ending detour with no legit solution. Having so can consume a lot of time and can be proved inefficient.
Thus, a well-directed discussion among people with varied thoughts can lead to a more robust solution and therefore more progress. But, such discussion must be end up with a final solution that takes care of all the pros and cons and shouldn’t be going on indefinitely without any output.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
...rity with variety of choices from which the he can choose the best. Most of the softwa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09717868339 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76706459193 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539184952978 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7367843005 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224650697407 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839963644828 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927326851237 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139311234613 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536444279329 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.