In Any Situation, Progress Requires Discussion Among People Who Have Contrasting Points Of View.
Progress comes when we know what our problems are as whole. We cannot make any progress based on single person’s opinion. But people may have different opinions and here are conflicts between people. Some may stand with your opinion while other may differ with your point of view. However, if people have a contrasting point of view but their intentions are gentle then they should require discussion for better progress.
Every people think differently. Everyone has their opinion which is right in their perspective but it may differ with other people. Sometime different point of may lead to make progressive decisions. For example, most of the company conducts team meetings to evaluate problems. All members put their point of view which may differ with other and then a team discusses everyone's point of view to make a better solution. If they ignore a contradictory view then this may not get a better solution. So, healthy discussion leads to progress.
Sometimes discussion among people gives us all pros and cons of a solution. Thus, people can have a variety of choices from which we choose the best. . For example, coach and captain have always different opinions. Their approach to game is different. Coach has experience of playing while captain is the one who will lead team in a game. If they do not discuss then they might lose games and confidence of other players. If they discuss their pros and cons of then they will surely make progress in next game. Thus, sometimes contradictory problems may stall progress but understanding different point of view leads to improvement.
In conclusion, a well-directed discussion among people with varied thoughts can lead to a better solution and therefore more progress. But, such discussion must be end up with a final solution that takes care of all the pros and cons and shouldn’t be going on indefinitely without any output.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Progress comes when we know what our pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...ire discussion for better progress. Every people think differently. Everyone has ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oint of view to make a better solution. If they ignore a contradictory view then t...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...althy discussion leads to progress. Sometimes discussion among people gives ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... choices from which we choose the best. . For example, coach and captain have alw...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72819317034 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498412698413 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0533126021 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.5454545455 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3181818182 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334256480827 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977235760944 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832415983396 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208983950033 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625147150525 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.