To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
When people elect their government they usually pay attention on moral standards of their future leader. These futures of government are very important. Based on these standarts the government will hold his/her position. I am strongly convinced that all leaders have to have the highest ethical and moral standards.
The main reason for my point of view is that leaders have to make important decisions and they can not be influenced from other people even if they offer a profit for them. Unfortunately, nowadyas, it is very popular to lobby some lows in government or pay money to sign contract in business. There is very bad situation in russia related with inexpensive palmic oil. We do not have strict rules about the quality of this oil and our government do not do anything for preventing of import oil with bad quality. The cause of this it that a big number of companies use this oil in monufactorind products and for them it will be not profitable to reject cheap oil. For preventing this unfair situation the leader of government or the boss in company has to be honest. They work for people and their low level of moral standards influences on people.
Another reason for my point of view is that the leader has to be popular, in other words, he is an ideal for many peoples. Consequently, he has to have all good feauters. If the head of company or the leader of government does not have highest ethical and moral standards people will not try to have and develop this feauters. They do not have perfect example behind them. In my city, fortunately, we have a perfect mayer. He is honest. As a result he has the team that has highest ethical standards too. Everybody are trying to be the same. This is why the leader has to have perfect feauters.
On the other hand, there could be situation when the leader has to forget about his moral standards and do what is necessary for his citizens. In big politic it is often when the leaders of different counries are trying to delude others leaders. However, ot is justified only if the leader does it for good purposes – for his citizens. Unfortunately, the majority of the leaders deludes only for their own prifit. So if all leaders have the highest ethical and moral standards there will not unfair situation and everything will be honest.
It has been seen that the leadres have to have special feauters. They have to be based on honesty and fairness. The leaders have not lobby lows because of their profit and have to be an ideal for people. The leaders have to prevet any unfair situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
When people elect their government they usua...
^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...ny or the leader of government does not have highest ethical and moral standards people will...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... we have a perfect mayer. He is honest. As a result he has the team that has highe...
^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the highest'.
Suggestion: has the highest
...onest. As a result he has the team that has highest ethical standards too. Everybody are tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lobbied'.
Suggestion: lobbied
...esty and fairness. The leaders have not lobby lows because of their profit and have t...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'as to', 'as a result', 'in other words', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217038539554 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.174442190669 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101419878296 0.0880659088768 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0567951318458 0.0497285424764 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0709939148073 0.0444667217837 160% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.117647058824 0.12292977631 96% => OK
Participles: 0.026369168357 0.0406280797675 65% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.52676967732 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0344827586207 0.030933414821 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0872210953347 0.0997080785238 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0141987829615 0.0249443105267 57% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0121703853955 0.0148568991511 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2560.0 2732.02544248 94% => OK
No of words: 454.0 452.878318584 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63876651982 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.308370044053 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.233480176211 0.280924506359 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.140969162996 0.200843997647 70% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114537444934 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52676967732 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405286343612 0.48968727796 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.4334131987 55.4138127331 80% => OK
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6194690265 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.6551724138 23.380412469 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1297242469 59.4972553346 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.275862069 141.124799967 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6551724138 23.380412469 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.310344827586 0.674092028746 46% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 39.0031900349 51.4728631049 76% => OK
Elegance: 1.19463087248 1.64882698954 72% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294969206057 0.391690518653 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123470799853 0.123202303941 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.066005144911 0.077325440228 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.470537728793 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128735771418 0.149214159877 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10846001667 0.161403998019 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828427572552 0.0892212321368 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384173493536 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0695342879767 0.0692045440612 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218182204939 0.275328986314 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441582137503 0.0653680567796 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.