To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Should the leaders have highest ethical and moral standards? The topic is quiet debatable. Here, the prompt asserts that leaders should have highest moral and ethical standards to be more effective. However, i mostly agree with the contention and defend my thesis based on two persuasive argument with evidene and further provide qualification regarding when my thesis may be subverted in some scenarios.
Firstly, the main duty and responsibility of a leader is to, not only guide others towards the common goals but also to be as an idol and inspire people to be just like him. The leaders are considered sucessful if he can persuade others in believing that his ideology will lead to goal for bright future to the extent that his followers will build character of the leader himself for achieving the goal. It is because, if a leader will not have highest moral and ethical standards, people will not believe in him and even such character may dissuade his followers to forgo the support. Similarly, for those who blindly support the leader, ethically immoral character of a leader will make followers make fallacious assumption about the leader and try to emulate the character leader has.
Secondly, moral and ethical standards inherited by the leader act as a measure to judge his overall ideology. The good moral and ethical standard could be indicator of how strong his leadership and ideology is. For instance, Mahathma Gandhi had his ideology of peaceful movement against the Britist and people used to follow him because he had strong moral and ethical conduct. If he had not been munificient and amicable to every people, people would not have followed his ideology. So due to the result of his kind and generous character, he was inpsiring and idol for many people not only of his time but also for youth of today.
Admittedly however, a leader would not require maintain moral and ethical standards. Specially in case of facism and when people are brainwashed in believing that their leader is ever caring and benevolent, the leader need not require any moral standard or ethics to maintain. He can just spread false roumer about him being a feirce leader, helper of the poor and enemy of devi to make his leadership effective.
In conclusion, the subject matter is moot and there are no easy answers. However, glancing upon various opposing views on issue, the leaders having high moral and ethical standards outweigh those who do not consider having moral and ethical standard as important part of their leadership but in some case however, there is no need to show moral and ethical standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
Should the leaders have highest ethical and moral standards? The topic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
... the prompt asserts that leaders should have highest moral and ethical standards to be more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...al. It is because, if a leader will not have highest moral and ethical standards, people wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...devi to make his leadership effective. In conclusion, the subject matter is moo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97949886105 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54138385694 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489749430524 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3241915373 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.444444444 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310709764103 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121489915649 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991377994437 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194694651774 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055448401938 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.