The best part to teach is to praise the positive actions and ignore the negative actions
Teaching is the crucial part of education and has an overwhelming impact on the life of the learner.
The arguer in his opinion considers that praising the positive actions and ignoring the negative ones of a person is the best way to teach someone. This opinion seems to be a controversial one. There are perhaps some instances where this would be judicious. Indisputably, if persons positive qualities are put forth towards him and followed by the approbation then he would definitely feel motivated and this will further boost up his confidence. Nevertheless, Negative actions of a person are a great proponent of improvement. So I would generally disagree with the “best ” word used in the argument.
First of all, being surrounded by the encomium would elevate a person in his undertaking but at the same time neglecting his negative deeds will not provide a critical analysis of his strengths and weaknesses. Glancing to the corporate world, we might say that employees working under Steve Jobs face many criticisms and aspersions as the part of their work. They have to be dealt with slander every-time they commit an error. Steve is of the view that even if the praises are concealed but the person should always be confronted with his mistakes, misdeeds, silly aspects of his work. This is the most important way to let him prosper in the future.
Furthermore, teachers are the ones who’s sole right is to show the positive directions to their followers and also to let them know the negative sides of their actions. Only praising the positive deeds might make a person over confident. Moreover, this might hinder his way of progress as it would be symptomatic that he has achieved the highest hallmark and no further improvements are required. He might feel that the his way is the only and the best way to accomplish a certain task. Unless he would be guided to make amendments toward his negative actions then only the true essence and need of a teacher would be justified.
Admittedly, the positive approbation will provide a person a boost in the work his is doing because there can be cases in which if the person is dogged with enumerable criticisms then he might lose hope and stop making any further trials on facing the repetitive failures. This is specially true when it comes to kindergarten school where the students are always appreciated for the things they learn and even their negative deeds are expounded and corrected in a very legible way. But looking back to the argument, we might not be fully warranted with the use of the word “best” because both praising and criticizing should go hand in hand.
In conclusion, although this argument’s claim that best way to teach is to praise the positive actions appears to be valid but at the same some might argue that ignoring the negatives would not be the best way to be a good teacher. Instead, there should e balance struck between the two areas of interest. Because we can imagine a movie or a ponderous tome to go without critics and the vieweres reactions and feedbacks. Hence, a good correlation collusion between the positive and negatives will be helpful for the betterment of the learners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 422, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...ements are required. He might feel that the his way is the only and the best way to acc...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 129, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ing because there can be cases in which if the person is dogged with enumerable cr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2672.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90275229358 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78388233259 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480733944954 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3382680993 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7083333333 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54166666667 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249298097364 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772226699481 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11210079455 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148380903856 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086434738697 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.