The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
When there is argument on any of the topic between two persons or any two groups than the result of that argument ultimately determines that how much the one person was able to powerfully convince the other person with opposing viewpoint.
If there is any debate on any of the topic then the both the parties should try to convince another party with conflicting viewpoint because any argument is justifiable or not only depends on how powerfully one party can convince another with its viewpoint. The party should keep the points in the argument such that it leads to conclusion and which incline the opposing party more towards its side in accepting its viewpoint. The party instead of getting indulge in the heated argument with the party with opposing viewpoint it should always try to influence opposing party such that the opposing party on it's own accept the ideas. If any child enters into an argument with his parents upon eating chocolates then he should try to convince his parents that he will not eat chocolates everyday but only on some days. So in that way he would be able to convince his parents upon eating chocolates or else he will enter into an heated argument with them and he would not be able to achieve success in his argument.
Sometimes there are possibilities that the person with unjustified view point may be able to convince the another person with justified opposing viewpoint so in that case the above statement may prove to be wrong. For example sometimes in court hearing the person who is not guilty is not able to keep his strong point in the court during the argument in the court with another opposing viewpoint advocate so in that case the person who is justified may loose the case.
Hence in sum the person should always keep his tone calm and keep the strong points in front of the person with opposing viewpoint. So with this the person can easily win the argument against the person with opposing viewpoint and can convince the person for accepting viewpoint.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should always try to influence opposing party such that the opposing party on it...
^^
Line 2, column 786, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...parents that he will not eat chocolates everyday but only on some days. So in that way h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 924, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...g chocolates or else he will enter into an heated argument with them and he would ...
^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e person with unjustified view point may be able to convince the another person w...
^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...at case the person who is justified may loose the case. Hence in sum the person shou...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...n who is justified may loose the case. Hence in sum the person should always keep hi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73714285714 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38720398314 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.377142857143 0.4932671777 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0541106346 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.8 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 23.4991977007 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311320778479 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151435651955 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402436628942 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198678975391 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482228266102 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 100.480337079 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.