Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convience someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting Views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.
Human beings of 21st century grasping knowledge according to their intrinsic propensity towards their Interest and they inclined to involve themselves with the particular field of interest. Their viewpoint regarding anything consider the thinking circle of their own field first, may be because they involved in it so much that they forgot to know anything about the opposite perception.The prompt recommends that ability of an argument to conveince someone with opposing viewpoint and its true value is to defend the idea against the doubts and contrasting viewpoint of others. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with this idea of prompt with three reasons.
To begin, There are 206 countries in the world and 300 religions and each religion and country has its own history and perception of living life with its own rules and regulations. Almost every person in this world follows a certain belief and norms of religion or his/her own own principles and values. So, we categorically say that everyone has different viewpoint, but if two people argues over one thing, it is sure that they have contrasting viewpoint But if one argues over any topic which has been entrenched in the mind of any individual will Impossible to convience, because it would have been settled in his mind after grasping multiple books,various studies, different training and living standards. For instance, Dalai lama and Albert Einstien surely would not agree with the viewpoints on God, Roger fedrer and saint yoga guru would not agree with the the idea of training tennis by yoga, a politician of india would not agree with Mother teresa for peace. Several debates on news channel would be resolved, if any of the argument done by news penalist were conveincing to opposite one. So, Above examples illustrates that multiple people having different viewpoints and to change the perception of entrenched shaken belief is inconceivable.
Further, a validview point has to take care the opposite one also, but people nowdays are not ready to accept this notion. Countries like china are not ready to debate over democray, France is not ready to become federal country even after several meetings with countries like india and USA. In 1989, metting with china and USA happened with the idea to implement democracy in China. Repoter of times nation, friedrie rubaria from china reported in her magazine that china took 2 months to ponder over this idea, but eventually denied this notion for accepting it, because their firmly belief of commuinism had not allowed them to accept it. Same happened with pakistan, People of pakistan had not let their country to govern by any individual, but, rather, they want army rule. For instance, total of 116 meeting between india and pakistan took place over the idea of democracy which of course could have been helped pakistan to trade more commodites to make its economy strong and reduce import taxes, But in the denial transcript, the reason of not accepting the idea of being democratic country was their perehistorical islamic belief, in which they mentioned that one individual cannot run a whole country on his belief. This illustrates that no matter, how persuasive the opposite one viewpoint will be, one wil definitely follows his own idea of living and reacting.
Moreover, political parties of any demcratic country considers view points of public for development in infrastructures, tax schemes and written constitution and they organize rallies and public speeches for it. They do it to compel people to follow a single rule and let them know in a sweet cunning manner that people will anyhow follow, what they ensue after elections results. For example, In 2019 in India, Online Campaign of submitting ideas of bridges and government offices had a massive apporval from publisidec to build 23 bridges and 47 government offices, Bhartiya janta parties considered public ideas and promised for implementing the same in the future, but after election, there were only 3 bridges and 17 offices built. This illustrates that the decisions had been taken by any single individual only and not considered the public viewpoint, which was anyhow not a good thing for public because their viewpoint eventually wasted and seemed bogus in the end.
Ofcourse, somewill argue that a valid viewpoint will be conveincing to everyone , persuade enough to answer each and every question of them. However, isn’t it wrong to say that everyone has different thinking and 2 in a 100 will not conveince. So above three reasons are helps to mentioned that everone has different viewpoints and valid viewpoint can never be able to conveince each and everybody.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Human beings of 21st century grasping knowledge according to their in...
^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they inclined to involve themselves with the particular field of interest. Their ...
^^
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... anything about the opposite perception.The prompt recommends that ability of an ar...
^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e are 206 countries in the world and 300 religions and each religion and country ...
^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: own
...belief and norms of religion or his/her own own principles and values. So, we categoric...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , various
...n his mind after grasping multiple books,various studies, different training and living ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 863, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...nd saint yoga guru would not agree with the the idea of training tennis by yoga, a poli...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 863, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...nd saint yoga guru would not agree with the the idea of training tennis by yoga, a poli...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...989, metting with china and USA happened with the idea to implement democracy in ...
^^
Line 13, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ideas of bridges and government offices had a massive apporval from publisidec t...
^^
Line 17, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iewpoint will be conveincing to everyone , persuade enough to answer each and ever...
^^
Line 17, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ove three reasons are helps to mentioned that everone has different viewpoints an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, as to, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 40.0 14.8657303371 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 114.0 58.6224719101 194% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3931.0 2235.4752809 176% => OK
No of words: 763.0 442.535393258 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15203145478 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.25570686339 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65227658401 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 371.0 215.323595506 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48623853211 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 1215.9 704.065955056 173% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.240514833 60.3974514979 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.913043478 118.986275619 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1739130435 23.4991977007 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213330136133 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586335527446 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591219383935 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118767722824 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688586273893 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 14.1392134831 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 190.0 100.480337079 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.