Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.Write a res

Essay topics:

Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.

Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Is persuade someone who has opposing view only way to find out true value of an idea? Convincing opponent of the agrement required deep analysis, communication skill and opponet who is not too tenacious. However, mental self analysis is other means to get value of an idea.

By mental analysis one can get deep insite of an argument and one has not required to convince someone who does not agree with that argument. For instance, Galelio argued that the earth is not centre of the universe and the earth is rotating around sun. At that time church and priests were not persuaded by galelio's arguement and sentenced galelio home arrest. But that does not prove that galelio does not know value of his argument. Even if he was in house arrest, he know he was true and stick to his argument which after some times accepted by the world. Therefore, to know significance of any argument persone does not need to convince person with opposing view.

Secondly, changing other person's view required more that just logical argument. Personality ad communication skill plays important role during converting someone to your side. For example, Thomas Edison was in favour of DC current, while Tesla was AC current side which is more efficient that DC current. But Thomas know how to turn people and politician in his favour and Tesla do not. Eventually people were using DC current for aroud tw decades despite it's lower efficiency due to transmition loss. Tesla was enable to implicate his point but he knew has his idea has more benefit. So, it is not necessary taht persuading someone to opposite side is only was to prove your point.

On the onther hand, giving opinion and try to convince other may give deep insite of that argument and might lead to clear doubt or error in our argument. For instance, group discussion is very effective than general class room teaching method because person understand core logic during discussion on whichever side hi might be.

In conclusion, there are other ways such as mental analysis to discover value of an idea and convincing opponet is not reflaction of importance of an agrument.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome arrest. But that does not prove that galelio does not know value of his argum...
^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
...ent. Even if he was in house arrest, he know he was true and stick to his argument w...
^^^^
Line 9, column 513, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...ency due to transmition loss. Tesla was enable to implicate his point but he knew has ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90358126722 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49926185705 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542699724518 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5088136512 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6842105263 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271131866098 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876407245303 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982457616091 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174950329864 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978927179958 0.0667264976115 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.