All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Many companies are struggling to run at their best efficiency and they hire outside consultants to advise them. On the other hand, listining to employees can also help to improve company's efficiency. There are valid arguement on both side and issue is more complext than it seems. To tackle employees' work specific prroblem, the best way is to discuss and take suggestions from employees. However, jumpling into new field and implementing new process require outside consultant help.
Many company tries to diverse thier businees which require technical expertise and skilled manpower for setting up business as soon as possible and outside expert consultant can help to achieve this. For example, Dhirubhai Ambani, India's richest busineessman, jump into refinery business from textile businees. He has no idea about setting up refinery, so he consulted a company whih is expert in setting up refinery. If dhirubhai relied on employees who have not any idea of refinery business, he may not reach to this prosperity stage. Therefor, consultants are best way to operate company more efficiently.
Secondly, many company required manpower for short time only and hiring consultatnt is economical feasible way. For example, comnapy need to market theur product and required manpower for door to door marketing for 2 month only. Hence, employing hugh manpower is big loss for company and they hire consultant. So, work with short need consultants are feasible.
On the other side, if company need feedback and advice on practical problem faced at work site, consulting employees is best approach. For instance, what health related problem incounter st site is best known by employes only.
In conclusion, based on task requirement company need to approach employees and consultant and sometimes mutual advice can also prove as effective than individual one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
...prosperity stage. Therefor, consultants are best way to operate company more efficiently...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun company seems to be countable; consider using: 'many companies'.
Suggestion: many companies
...ompany more efficiently. Secondly, many company required manpower for short time only a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 218, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...npower for door to door marketing for 2 month only. Hence, employing hugh manpower is...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 148, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as effective 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...tual advice can also prove as effective than individual one.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41780821918 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73805599786 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1936273631 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0588235294 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321163615853 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110491248121 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961081032999 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167575830835 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572383171639 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.