Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The main flaw in argement is speaker does not mentioned fetality rate of both cow flu and inoculation. If death from inoculation is far less that numbers of people dying from cow flu, the final conclusion falls apart. Persons has to sacrifice small amount to achieve something big. For example, every medicine is tested on human before final approval and launching into any market. This experiments take many life ranging from rats to humans. But that does not means we should stop testing drugs and launch them in market which may leads to higher death than death during experiments. So, information of mortality rate plays important part in evaluation of this arguement.
Secondle, no data is givenon nature and severity of consequencies of inoculation. For example, if side effect resulting from inoculation can be treated, one should not resist from implimenting routinely administration of inoculation in affected area. In this circumstances, speaker's fincal conclusion become invalid.
Finally, if above are not hte cases, the arguement should contains information on effects of cow flu n inffected people. For instance, supose cow flu is not much harmful and minor fever is major result of infection. Then, there is no room for inoculation as inoclulation is far deletaries. and this streanthen the atr
In conclusion, lack of information puts the agruement into question and cast doubts to th conclusion. Providing addition information on mortatlity rate, consequencies and can be used to more effective evaliation of thr arguement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
...in flaw in argement is speaker does not mentioned fetality rate of both cow flu and inocu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ested on human before final approval and launching into any market. This experime...
^^
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
... into any market. This experiments take many life ranging from rats to humans. But t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun life seems to be countable; consider using: 'many lives'.
Suggestion: many lives
... into any market. This experiments take many life ranging from rats to humans. But that d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ion of inoculation in affected area. In this circumstances, speakers fincal conclusi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 59, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'contain'
Suggestion: contain
...are not hte cases, the arguement should contains information on effects of cow flu n inf...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...tion as inoclulation is far deletaries. and this streanthen the atr In conclus...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, second, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 55.5748502994 65% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 2260.96107784 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 244.0 441.139720559 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40163934426 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02825314646 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651639344262 0.468620217663 139% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 705.55239521 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7927841475 57.8364921388 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.8666666667 119.503703932 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.70786347227 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143170708338 0.218282227539 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428647834947 0.0743258471296 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433044499647 0.0701772020484 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789202869608 0.128457276422 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357511660509 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 98.500998004 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.