The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It is very important for a society to have abundant human resources in different sectors specially leadership. Society is responsible for nurturing and training human beings for various roles and give them the ability to develop certain social and technical skills such as leadership, which is a very important skill. Two methods suggested here both have their own merits and demerits.
When there is a competition among people they become more sensitive to stress and pressure, which is always present in competitors. Nowadays, it has become evident by researchers' endeavours that long-term stress can lead to various diseases such as cancer, which is a very serious one. There are also mental damages like developing the sense of malice in people by creating unhealthy competition which happens when people try to circumvent the competition to eliminate others. Therefore, competition or better say the idea of "the fittest will survive" can damage public health in long term.
In contrast, a cooperative environment can be very effective since, for example, top students cooperate with average ones giving them the opportunity to learn many new subjects and skills from their peers. To say more, colleagues in an office would also benefit from cooperation they manage to produce results with much less errors and much better accuracy and quality as everything is quality controlled by more than one person. when cooperating, people develop their social skills along other skills since there is a considerable amount of communication overhead.
On the other hand, the sense of competition enforces competitors to develop much better skills in a competitive atmosphere in much less time. For example, when students compete against one another to enter top graduate schools and colleges, the best students manage to get into top schools and in doing so they will gain a lot of knowledge and skills which may not be developed easily in a cooperative environment. However, in this method less social skills is developed since students are very likely to maximise their own gain rather than the greater good of a group and will become less cooperative with their peers in fear of giving them a competitive advantage.
In conclusion, it can be said that both methods have their own advantages and disadvantages making the decision of chosing one difficult and situation dependent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...hey manage to produce results with much less errors and much better accuracy and qua...
^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ity controlled by more than one person. when cooperating, people develop their socia...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... difficult and situation dependent.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 2260.96107784 90% => OK
No of words: 381.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31233595801 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83320416346 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53280839895 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4000755175 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.571428571 119.503703932 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2142857143 23.324526521 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.70786347227 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135028008994 0.218282227539 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527913839295 0.0743258471296 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527122690807 0.0701772020484 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758012112173 0.128457276422 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057975669814 0.0628817314937 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.3799401198 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.3550499002 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.