The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
It is an unequivocal fact that the leaders of any generation, in government,industry or other fields, hold the most power in any nation and their temperament is crucial in the success or failure of the people they lead. This begs the questions; should young children, our future leaders, be groomed by instilling a sense of coperation or competition? I would like to contend that cooperation is a far more important aspect of a leader than competitiveness.
The ability to cooperate is a fundamental aspect of being a leader. A leader, by himself, can't achieve great heights without the support of those around him. Only through the collective efforts of the group can one hope to succeed. For instance, a politician might have great schemes in mind for his electorate. However, implementation of any proposal will require coordination with many other departments, without which the citizens can not hope to reap any benefits.
Instilling a sense of cooperation also helps individuals to judge the abilities of people around them; their strengths and their weaknesses. This judgment is of paramount importance to a leader without which all hopes and plans will be only perfunctory. For instance, if a CEO of a company doesn't have any clue about working in close coordination with people, how can he hope to assign tasks to the hundreds of people around him with tunnel vision.
Also, being cooperative makes a leader more amiable and dependable to his peers. Any leader who runs a one-man show can't hope to resolve issues from time to time. In fact, most employees won't even feel comfortable bringing the problems they face, on the table. In such a scenario, the leader will be tantamount to a burden on his own people.
However, things aren't always black and white and just being cooperative isn't enough. In this age of cut-throat competition, leaders need to be fiercely competitive if they hope to realise the goals set for themselves. Young students should definitely be also taught to be competitive among their peers and always aim to be the best. If a leader is not continuouslly driven and motivated by the success of his peers, he is not truly fullfiling his role.
In conclusion, any young students, aspiring to be a leader, needs to be of an eclectic nature. What is required is a fusion of both cooperation and competition to groom young ones to be the superlative leaders we hope them to be.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , industry
...leaders of any generation, in government,industry or other fields, hold the most power in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...f being a leader. A leader, by himself, cant achieve great heights without the suppo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ry. For instance, if a CEO of a company doesnt have any clue about working in close co...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ers. Any leader who runs a one-man show cant hope to resolve issues from time to tim...
^^^^
Line 9, column 17, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...n on his own people. However, things arent always black and white and just being c...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ck and white and just being cooperative isnt enough. In this age of cut-throat compe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93137254902 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97800471973 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8368294242 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8095238095 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116370918577 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351498482778 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441398381936 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668356311294 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035678375455 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.