The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
For nurturing leadership qualities in individuals in several prevalent fields today, a sense of cooperation within an individual is must. The impact of having cooperation as a tool in an individual's inventory is significant and can be justified as shown in the trailing examples.
I personally think that a sense of cooperation in any individual starts growing from his childhood days. Take for instance kids playing a team sport in park are always taught by their parents to cooperate with each other and actively take further the game in a sporty way. When kids interact with each other, they learn about one's flaws and try to get used to it by cooperating with each other.
Furthermore, schools are another source of imbibing cooperation among students. It is in school only that students are taught to be a team player rather than an individualist. School activities like sports and team projects give the students an exposure to their peers ideas and thoughts. It is in school only that a student learns how cooperation is must for any team task to reach its culmination. Not only the cooperative quality within student is enhanced but also the leadership qualities are identified.
Adding further, truly cooperation is a must have quality not only during the early days of life but also when one enters the corporate phase. In many professional and business sectors, cooperation amongst different sectors if absent, will never allow the task to reach the end. One common example of cooperation amongst teams is the IT consultancy sector. In such sectors, to drive the client requirement, a whole lot of teams like the business, development, testing and support need a perfect collaboration and cooperation amongst themselves.
I agree to the fact that cooperation is a must-have quality in an individual but a slight touch of competition to any task can also have an appreciable impact. It is competition only that allows an individual to go beyond limits and think rigorously and come up with an innovative solution.
Looking at all the above mentioned instances it is glaringly obvious that having cooperation as an asset is truly beneficent for an individual in the long run. But a slight taste of competition is also required which in turn forces the individual to go beyond their own limits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sporty way" with adverb for "sporty"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ther and actively take further the game in a sporty way. When kids interact with each other, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...eract with each other, they learn about ones flaws and try to get used to it by coop...
^^^^
Line 13, column 330, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...example of cooperation amongst teams is the IT consultancy sector. In such sectors, to...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 409, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...ors, to drive the client requirement, a whole lot of teams like the business, development...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07832898172 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9495319804 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519582245431 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0038311646 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.055555556 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0786258033887 0.243740707755 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028833363966 0.0831039109588 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447663446752 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047226468164 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405387360633 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.