Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
It is quite true a fact that there are inherent physical differences between men and women. But this should not mandate that women or even men to restrict themselves to a certain set of tasks. As we know that ever since human race came into existence, it has a passed down tradition from generations to generations that women should restrict themselves to a specific set of household tasks and men should be designated for all laborious tasks. This was generally a trend which was widely followed for quite a long time. In some regions, formerly women were not even allowed to leave houses and were also forbidden from going to schools whereas men were free from any such restrictions. This lead to an increasing knowledge gap and thus differentiating men from women.
As time went by, with the advent of technology and the increasing rate of women education, women have recognised their true potential and have identified roles where they can stand equal to men. For example, in corporate and management sectors, it is glaringly apparent that the number of female employees are almost equal to the number of male employees. Even, with the intrinsic differences, they have reached at positions where bestest of the men could not even dream of. Not only in the job sector, women have also been on par with men in many sports sectors as well. We could not even think of a sport which does have a female version to it.
Furthermore, in early days, women could not even think of joining military or the police forces but with the progression of time their numbers in these forces kept on growing and has reached a level no one could have ever imagined. The engineering fields requiring huge physical efforts, were formerly densely populated with men numbers. But with the innovation of heavy machineries that are replacing human efforts, it is now possible for women to stand equal to men in such fields.
However, there are still some fields where we tend to see the men to women ratio inclined largely towards the men. These are the fields that require arduous physical efforts with high risks associated per se and women generally tend to stay aloof from such tasks. And it is quite natural for them for them to do so but who knows we might even see them dominating these fields in the future.
Altogether, from the above examples it is quite obvious that even though physically different from each other, men and women are quite capable of doing the same set of tasks and no one can restrict or designate someone to tasks based on their sex. According to me, everyone should be allowed to explore different things out of their scope and finally settle on the thing that suits them the most or which they find pleasure in doing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 289, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'for them'.
Suggestion: for them
...rom such tasks. And it is quite natural for them for them to do so but who knows we might even se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 249, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...te someone to tasks based on their sex. According to me, everyone should be allowed to explore ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, still, thus, well, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76100628931 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45721266289 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4210776228 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.526315789 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1052631579 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328174719393 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100044461973 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534200560378 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168516013569 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304702514947 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.