The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The crux of the topic is that the best way of teaching is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones. I partially agree with the statement for the following reasons and I am going to provide some epitome to bolster my stance.
First of all, education is pivotal needs in our life and educational process or pedagogy is more important. There is a physiology behind the teaching process, proper teaching can reform a students life and thinking, and it may be effective for the students if their positive actions had been praised but ignore the negative actions may not be sometimes effective or apposite. Teachers must balanced between praise and criticization.
Praise the positive effort by students should be praised and that can motivate them to work harder, and instead of criticization, a teacher can just point out his mistakes which can improve his performance. In case of a young child, it is really important to keep patience with them and chastise them, sometime could bring adverse effect. For example, in kindergarten a teacher could set some stricture like behave properly or pick up your hand before speak in the class. When students done properly should be praised or may be awarded and the student who might not follow the rules first, started to pick up the habits in some times. It would be effective if the insolent student is ignored. But there is always a limit in the ignoring the negative actions.
Always ignoring the negative actions can be fatal and silence might boost the negative actions. For example, if a studets is talking in the class, first a teacher could ignore him and later he might talk to him and let him understand that talking is not proper decorum in the class. In this case ingoring is the best effective way to teach. But, in case of a students create a pandemonium in a laboratory then he could harm himself or other students or even school properties by doing so, and ignoring them will be fatal. In that case a teacher should confront him and should take proper actions against him.
On the other hand, some people might argue that always praise positive actions and ignoring negative ones is the most effective way in teach the children. But we already know it is not always effective and could hamper the students himself.
At the epilogue tof the topic I would say from the above examples that an effective way of teaching is balanced between praise the positive effort, keep patience and criticization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...g process, proper teaching can reform a students life and thinking, and it may be effect...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 357, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...effective way to teach. But, in case of a students create a pandemonium in a laboratory th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffort, keep patience and criticization.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, so, then, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80751173709 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54040504329 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462441314554 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4878336127 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.789473684 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4210526316 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209212629394 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758844793809 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801283360026 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139093056035 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776965360504 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.