The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The recommendation that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative actions doesn't very well shape the best and the most effective way of teaching according to me.
Teachers are those elements of a society who are sure responsible to bring out the best in their students but at the same time they can't just be ignoring negative actions. Instead, i believe, apart from encouraging positive actions, teachers should highlight negative actions in their students and help them get away from it so they can become better citizens. Overall growth and development of a student happens when he/she does not only outshine in the areas of their strength but also are able to overcome their areas of weakness or negativity.
Responsibility of a guide or teacher is to shape its students such that they are morally, socially and culturally sound. Let us take a scenario inside a class where a student is brilliant at maths but proves to be a disturbing element for the entire class. If the teacher just supports the student for his superb abilities in maths and neglects his disturbing activities in the classroom premises, the entire class of students and their understanding would go for a toss. Instead, the teacher should sit with the student and help him to become more cooperative and understand that every student has a different pace and he would have to keep patience with everybody. There are other several negative actions like cheating, bullying etc which cannot be overlooked instead have to be rectified so that children develop good etiquette and are able to increase plus points in their bucket.
Though it is the best way to keep praising positive actions along with rectifying negative ones, in some use cases, it becomes beneficial to just ignore the fallacies. For example, if a student has interest in the field of design and not in math class, he would seem to be self-engrossed and inattentive. He would not be able to score much in maths. In this case the teacher can ignore the inattentiveness and poor marks scored and instead try to motivate the child for what he is good at, i.e. design and help him succeed.
Praising positive actions and providing support sure has good results but ignoring the negative actions totally would not take us much far if we take it as a recommendation for the best way to teach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ive actions and ignore negative actions doesnt very well shape the best and the most e...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...heir students but at the same time they cant just be ignoring negative actions. Inst...
^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... be ignoring negative actions. Instead, i believe, apart from encouraging positiv...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, apart from, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85643564356 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68864754204 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1715117353 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.142857143 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21061180615 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081063553469 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856976011108 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160176855974 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816641386812 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.