The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

One can use many different methods and attitudes when teaching or conferring knowledge, skills, or experience upon others. The statement suggests that the best way to teach others is to compliment positive actions while ignoring negative ones. While this approach may work in some instances, it fails to consider many nuances in which it is not the best way of teaching and thus is not the best way to teach. One needs to consider the individuality of both the teacher and the student, the subject or skill that is being taught, and the motivations behind certain actions to determine and proceed with the best style of teaching.

First, we need to consider who the teacher and the student are, the student’s learning style, and the subject being taught. On one hand, the teacher could be a parent, classroom teacher, or coach. However, they may also be a friend or peer, employee, or even one’s own child. On the other hand, the standing of the student can also differ. Younger children may need more positive reinforcement and compliments for their actions, while older children and adults require much more constructive and realistic feedback on their work—both positive and negative. Differences in age and social relations between the mentor and mentee may result in different teaching methods being employed—a parent or employer may find it more effective to point out and help overcome the shortcomings of a student, while an employee may find it best to simply teach and not give much feedback to their students. The method of teaching also depends on the subject—a coach or music teacher may find it most effective when pointing out the errors made by their students in order to prevent them from making them again, a technician teaching a skill may require no feedback at all, and other teaching relationships such as classroom teaching and parenting may require a combination of positive and negative feedback.

Second, we need to discuss the potential consequences of exclusively praising positive behaviors and ignoring negative ones. Many people have personal anecdotes about the spoiled child that has heard nothing but praise and permission their entire life. While extreme parenting or teaching methods that fixate on condemning negative behavior are frowned upon in many communities now—such as physical or emotional punishment—there is a general consensus that constructive criticism is needed in order to raise children and students who are aware of both themselves and of the society around them. When their negative behaviors are ignored, the student may think that their actions are not important and consequential and could eventually lead to repeating these behaviors—some extreme examples include drug abuse, self-harm, and bullying.

Lastly, we need to consider the grey areas of “positive” and “negative” actions, the motivators behind these actions, and what alternative teaching methods are more effective. Sometimes it is difficult to make definitive judgements on certain actions, especially ones that may stem from trauma, external pressure, stress, physical and chemical imbalances, and more. When actions are not glaringly positive or negative—such as when a child takes food from home without parental permission to give to a hungry classmate—it is difficult to follow the stringent teaching method of praise or ignore. Instead, one should explore the motivations behind these actions and then take proper steps to address both the motives and actions. Studies have found that parents who are good role models to their children (e.g. by not being on their phones incessantly, have a healthy work-life balance, enjoys various healthy hobbies) often have children that have less behavioral issues.

Praising positive and ignoring negative actions can be useful in some cases—dogs have shown to be most responsive to positive reinforcement. By not fixating on finding fault in the student and then berating them for it, the teacher is able to focus on the desirable behaviors and encourage them. However, it is far from the best teaching method to apply to everything from parenting to coaching. We need to consider the uniqueness of each teacher-student relationship and the consequences of ignoring deleterious behavior and glorifying good ones. We also need to understand that we may not always understand the motivations and underlying factors that give rise to certain behaviors. A better method of teaching combines positive reinforcement, constructive criticism, and role-modeling.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
One can use many different methods and attitudes when teaching or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...ical or emotional punishment—there is a general consensus that constructive criticism is needed i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding society'?
Suggestion: the surrounding society
...who are aware of both themselves and of the society around them. When their negative behaviors are igno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., first, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, then, thus, while, such as, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 51.0 14.8657303371 343% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3867.0 2235.4752809 173% => OK
No of words: 713.0 442.535393258 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42356241234 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.16740358842 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05013716896 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 324.0 215.323595506 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454417952314 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1179.0 704.065955056 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.77640449438 619% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.9859103427 60.3974514979 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.730769231 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4230769231 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17167611395 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596977335991 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719582117526 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119980284297 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556710567445 0.0667264976115 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 180.0 100.480337079 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.