Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
It goes without saying that leading each enterprise such as company, government, educational institute, is important any time. Nowadays, despite this fact, there is controversial question whether we should change our head ever five years or not. I am afraid I disagree with this Idea that expressing changing head every five years is effective.
To begin with, leading enterprise, correctly is a good happening, appearing by considering the leader result instead of lead period of time, which he or she is leading. It is crystal clear, the best way for evaluating leadership is comparing out comes, in compare to the other leader who leaded the enterprise. Opponents may argue that details of each enterprise led to victories but the main point is that all parts of our company or society or school is influenced by leader and also leader has chosen all section and policy of our enterprise, therefore, leader impression in obtaining goals is perceivable. As an illustration, we can consider Steve Jobs – the leader of apple company <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">– </span>he was leading apple almost for 9 years and undeniably, no one in board feels to change during in that years.
Nevertheless, some one argues that abusing the power is one of the most significant reason for changing leader every five years. It is true that power can impress on everybody, dramatically but we have to know if the leader wants to abuse from his power, it can happen any time and we need to prepare for this kinds of cases every time even one month after starting leading. Surely, breaking the laws or make a mistake, deliberately, will be the signs of abusing. One experience can drive this fact home. Saedi was a manager of Melli Bank in Iran, he had exchanged One million dollar before receiving the first year of his managing. If Iran had had strong rules for preventing from abusing managers from their power, this accident would not happen.
The other matter to discuss between dissents and proponents is about using new person in leading, because they improve our strategy and update our traditional plan. Without shadow of doubt, improving and updating plan is conducive in everywhere. However changing leader is not merely, the path of updating an elaborating, for this notion, we need to review our company or university or government structure, profoundly. Under such a circumstance, we could find our flaws and start changing. What is more, the leader can be the person, who start to reform. For example, some countries like, Singapore, Japan, Hong Kong, and so on start reforming through their prior leader.
In conclusion, as for reasons and examples, mentioned before, I do believe choosing new leader every 5 years is due to improve or prevent to abuse is wrong choice. In addition, we should consider leader’s outcomes for evaluating his or her managing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It goes without saying that leading each...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... head every five years is effective. To begin with, leading enterprise, corre...
^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ering the leader result instead of lead period of time, which he or she is leading. It is crys...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... leader impression in obtaining goals is perceivable. As an illustration, we can ...
^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...during in that years. Nevertheless, some one argues that abusing the power is one of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...pen any time and we need to prepare for this kinds of cases every time even one mont...
^^^^
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...the first year of his managing. If Iran had had strong rules for preventing from abusin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wer, this accident would not happen. The other matter to discuss between diss...
^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...dating plan is conducive in everywhere. However changing leader is not merely, the path...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reforming through their prior leader. In conclusion, as for reasons and exampl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, i am afraid, it is true, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0756302521 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91012419378 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579831932773 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8664495275 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.047619048 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130010420947 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377383910124 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362606551584 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746783965369 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242933193585 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.