Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership

Essay topics:

Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.

Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership

In the past, when the king's ruled there were no axioms about their tenure in power. However, as we progressed they opted the best way to decide who should look after the country, that is people. We decide who should be in authority by voting, the party with the majority of votes wins. I accord with the author that authorities need to step down when they aren't contributing to society to the extent they meant to be. Additionally, revitalization of enterprise with new leader is a prominent way for success. However, the time that is fixed by the writer about there tenure is not convincing.

To begin with, Leaders play a pivotal rule in success in their respective fields. Since they need to be adept and have sufficient judiciousness to lead the enterprise towards advancement. However, it is innate in humans that they get avarice when they are in power for long. Although, they aren't contributing to the society they still seek to be in power. Hence, it becomes necessary for us to have sufficient power to dethrone him when it is compulsory. For instance, In India congress ruled for five decades since we got independence. The people in authority got complacent and stopped thinking about people who voted. started filling their pockets. In that year, it was noted that India has seen corruption of $100million. SInce people have realized about it and dethroned them in the next elections.

Additionally, revitalization also plays a crucial role in progress. Since, people are changing incessantly and their views, choices. To run paralleling along with them it is necessary to have people with new idea. Who could agree with the new generation and allow development in it.

Lastly, the tenure time cannot be generalized. Since, it is necessary to realize that we cannot have a efficient new leader after every five years. We need to leave the choice upto people. when to dethrone the person in authority. Since this could be the best possible way to decide when somenone is not sufficient to lead.

To sum up, I agree with the author's argument that change necessary for development and it also pushes people in power to work in even harder to retain their power. We need someone with new ideas who could cope with the new generation and be adaptive to advancement happening in the surrounding. However, to have a new leader for every five years is not possible.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...authorities need to step down when they arent contributing to society to the extent t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...varice when they are in power for long. Although, they arent contributing to the society...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...y are in power for long. Although, they arent contributing to the society they still ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Started
...topped thinking about people who voted. started filling their pockets. In that year, it...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ecessary to realize that we cannot have a efficient new leader after every five y...
^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...e need to leave the choice upto people. when to dethrone the person in authority. Si...
^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e need to leave the choice upto people. when to dethrone the person in authority. Si...
^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en to dethrone the person in authority. Since this could be the best possible way to ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...to lead. To sum up, I agree with the authors argument that change necessary for deve...
^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve years is not possible.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, lastly, look, so, still, for instance, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93842364532 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70767188814 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460591133005 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9776468719 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.6071428571 118.986275619 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131808865466 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038012724392 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429052334715 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814254513132 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273706364776 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.