Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author of the issue states that we should not trust some of the things we assume as fact at first and we must first prove these things. The reason of the issue is that most of the thing we suppose that are factual things, in the future, turn out to be fallacious thought. Although wholeheartedly acceptance of the things may be misleading in some fields, it may has disadvantages in the other fields.
In some fields of science it seems impossible to prove all the things at first because it may be time-consuming and makes we getting far from our main goal. For example, in accurate field like Mathematics, it is so demanding to prove all the theories before proposing a new theory. Some people say that reinventing the wheel makes we keep away from our main aim. Therefore, in deterministic fields it does not make sense to prove all theories before doing anything.
On the other hands, in some other fields which they are not deterministic and knowledge of human accept them skeptically we should be prudent enough before accept them wholeheartedly. For example, yet, some of theories in psychology and sociology turns out to be correct by new research. In such field of study, if someone accept such things before any scrutinizing on them may be misleading .we may propose new theory based on spurious thought. So in non-deterministic fields of knowledge which our knowledge is superficial about them, it demands to deliberate on them before acceptance of such things.
All in all, to put it in a nutshell, it depends on the type of fields. On one hand, in non-deterministic sciences, it does not seem plausible to accept anything plausible and we should have a skeptical view about them since most of the things in such fields are not fact, but a hypothesis. On the other hands, if the intent of the issue is some deterministic fields of study, deliberate study and looking for proving any theories not only it may be time-consuming but also it may make us getting far from the main aim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e issue states that we should not trust some of the things we assume as fact at first and w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the theories') or simply say ''some theories''.
Suggestion: some of the theories; some theories
... them wholeheartedly. For example, yet, some of theories in psychology and sociology turns out t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'accepts'.
Suggestion: accepts
...rch. In such field of study, if someone accept such things before any scrutinizing on ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y scrutinizing on them may be misleading .we may propose new theory based on spuri...
^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them before acceptance of such things. All in all, to put it in a nutshell, it ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73638968481 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89122112831 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43553008596 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8978432281 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.071428571 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157896224109 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678307868957 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586052436097 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109977512623 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472305286557 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.