Claim: Imagination is more valuable asset than experience
Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes
In the above statement the author claims that imagination is a more valuable attribute than experience. He asserts this statement on basis of the reason that those people who do not have experience in a particular field would have the liberty to imagine whatever they want without the constraints of established beliefs and accepted dogma. Though this statement has certain credibility, I am not completely in accord with the statement.
People who do not have experience in their particular field rely on imaginations or superficial beliefs. At times, the hypothesis they build up might not be feasible in practical world. For example, a neophyte in field of research and development of astronomy can make up copious amount of hypothetical theories regarding big bang, black holes or string theory. But on absolute study of these theories they might not hold any feasibility. These theories would be considered abysmal and based on mere impractical imaginations. In this case experience is a much more valuable asset, as a veteran scientist can better analyze the theories and hypothesis than an amateur.
On the other hand. imagination outside the boundaries of established beliefs and orthodox thoughts can lead to ground breaking inventions and discoveries. Pure imagination of inexperienced freshers in various fields have resulted in incredible inventions which are still useful to the world. If Einstein hadn't imagined about discovering electricity, then the world might be still covered in darkness. If Gandhiji and other freedom fighters hadn't imagined a free India, then Indians would have still been under British Rule. It was the imagination of Wright Brothers that gave airplane - a flying machine credibility. The world is today grateful to such great scientists and leaders for their imaginations and their faith in their path.
Although, not all imaginations lead to useful theories and outcome. According to the author, people should be free to imagine whatever they want, but what if these imaginary goals are deleterious for entire humanity. Not all people have benign thoughts and intentions for development. Some imaginations might inflict irreversible damage on the face of whole world. Also, certain imaginations might not be applicable in practical or we might not be equipped with advanced technology to meet these goals. This would just lead to waste of much precious time and energy of the scholarly. In certain cases this can also lead to permanent mental and psychological damage for the person.
In conclusion, imagination would be an important asset more than experience if used for constructive and fruitful research and development. But, experience in any field can invariably be helpful in further developments. Experience is thus as important as imagination for ameliorating living standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Imagination
...than an amateur. On the other hand. imagination outside the boundaries of established b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
... still useful to the world. If Einstein hadnt imagined about discovering electricity,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
... If Gandhiji and other freedom fighters hadnt imagined a free India, then Indians wou...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quipped with advanced technology to meet these goals. This would just lead to was...
^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In conclusion, imagination would be an important asset more than experience ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, still, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44671201814 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03116089394 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4039846009 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3846153846 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9615384615 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282032017831 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766251775979 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731228901717 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165086702336 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437664935203 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.