Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
The above statement asserts that the situation, time and circumstances should be taken into consideration before giving a verdict. The author contends that laws should be flexible enough to take all these factors into consideration. In my opinion, some amount of flexibility is required in all laws for fair and indifferent judgement. Though, this flexibility should be in moderate amount.
Laws are invariably an important part of a country. Laws help in maintaining order and alignment in the society. Without a definite law and order system, country faces absolute chaos and uncontrollable situations. Laws are necessary to distinguish between what is morally and technically acceptable or unacceptable. While there are concrete laws which all denizens are abided to follow, there should be some flexibility. When citizens are compelled to follow certain rules and regulations strictly, it might hamper their fundamental development or land them in excessively deleterious situations. For example, if someone commits a murder in order to save themselves, it should be considered as an act of self-defense. They might have committed the crime unknowingly and unintentionally to protect their life. In that case, the laws must be flexible enough to come to a fair and right verdict.
Laws are devised in order to protect the citizens from all evils and crimes and not to restrict them while keeping the criminal activities in check. Also the basic canons in a community must look at the possible scenarios. The accused should be given chance to put forward his/her point and the verdict should be given keeping the circumstances in mind. For instance, in Dubai, by law the hands of a thief are cut when caught and proved guilty. But before taking such intense steps it should be considered that under what circumstances was the person forced to steal. It is possible that he might be an indigent who does have the means to fulfill basis requirements and desperately decides to steal food. In such a case, compassion should be shown towards that person.
However, it is not always necessary that the accused has pristine intentions. Probably, a murderer might have framed the whole situation to look like an act of self defense or an accident. Or the thief might have posed to be helpless in order to escape legal actions. To avoid such traps and bring justice, it is extremely important to analyze whole situation thoroughly. It is also required to lucidly define the term "flexibility in law". Flexibility should be extended up to a moderate state. Too much flexibility might result in misuse or circumvention of laws. Using these loopholes in the rules, the criminal might escape justice and be free from any legal proceedings.
Hence, it is important to keep the crimes in check and all activities in control while giving some amount of freedom to the citizens. In conclusion, the laws should be flexible as far as all concerned are safe and justice is served to the victim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aws for fair and indifferent judgement. Though, this flexibility should be in moderate...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...eping the criminal activities in check. Also the basic canons in a community must lo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11201629328 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95378601346 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501018329939 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 797.4 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7553916683 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6666666667 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3666666667 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.43333333333 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301910795441 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863767787993 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839020688281 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188526683789 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690292543476 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.