The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
An authoritative body in any aspect of society is the one which maintains peace and decorum in the system and among its people. A particular person or a Group of people in authority is the one entitled with the responsibility of maintaining well-being in the community and making appropriate decisions for its amelioration. Though when the body in authority is challenged or questioned it can lead to further chaos and discomfort in the society or it can lead to enhancement of the system.
When the authorities are questioned about their intentions for the betterment of the society and their actions are closely scrutinized and often criticized by the people, it augments distrust among the people. The members of the community develop hostility for authority and often feel unsafe and try to over-rule the governing body. For instance, when any leader or minister of a particular government ruling the country is accused of a crime he may or may not have committed (this can also be an act of maligning his/her reputation by the opposite party), the citizens automatically assume the worst and declare him/her unfit to assume the position of a leader. Questioning their authority and in some cases starting an insurgent movement leads to mis-management and chaos in the country.
A community or society is a group of people striving for achieving same goal and with similar thoughts for their betterment. A society can be as big as a country or a small organization; while questioning the body with authority in any type of society often leads to discomfort and dissatisfaction. For example, in every educational institution there is a student governing body who works under the directions of the faculties to keep up discipline and order in the institute. This body has the authority to make particular decisions and take proper actions to meet their goal. When their authority is challenged by other students, order in the institution is disrupted. This challenge can also be turned into an opportunity to change or develop the system further by introspections, but with the right attitude of people in authority.
We can also take examples from corporate organizations like multinational companies. For every project carried out by the company there is a project chairman who sees to the development and working of the project. He works with his colleagues on the project and takes necessary decisions and actions for betterment of the company. But there could be ample of objections from other members of the team about his decisions. in such cases the person in authority can listen to all the objections and then make the right decisions or he can misuse his power to seize others from questioning his place. In the latter case, with right attitude, he has the opportunity to turn this revolt in his favour.
Hence, questioning the authority by many people can be deleterious for the society as a whole or it can be turned into a positive impact for betterment of the society by the open-minded and optimistic attitude of the authority.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...embers of the team about his decisions. in such cases the person in authority can ...
^^
Line 9, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of the society by the open-minded and optimistic attitude of the authority.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, may, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0315581854 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03106601126 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424063116371 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 834.3 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3911796359 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.55 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.35 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250783456698 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719716658512 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779102408072 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169140435154 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099636866833 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.