Claim: An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In this information world the information travels faster than anything, even light. These days it is very easy to get any type of information, from any where around the globe. We have always relied on what is called as facts throught out the journey of mankind, but it is incorrect to say that a peice of information or fact should be mistrusted as it may be proven wrong in future. The reason stated that the most of the information that people assume as factual turns out to be wrong. This is reasoning has no concrete base on which it is being based, as a peice of information that is assumed as fact is a mistake done by people rather than information itself.
For example, the value of mathematical constant Pi, it hhsa been taken as fact and has never changed whatsoever, a fact is something that is being accepted by scientific community as a fact. A fact is not any peice of information that people think it to be fact, it has never happened that an information being treated as a fact by scientific community has been proven wrong in general, the term fact itself stands for which cannot change and has passed the test of time. There are several things that are ben treated as facts, for example the speed of light, several constant of physics such as Rho, Ohms Law, mathematical Pythogarous Theorem, the laws determining the congruency of triangles etc. they are have been accepted as facts. They have easily stood the test of time and have never been proved wrong, thus rejecting a fact by the fear that it may turn out to be false in future is mere stupidity.
Science has alway move ahead by making mistakes, this is a very essential part of moving forward with respect to any thing. If we don't take a peice of information as fact and do experiment with them then there is no way we as humanity can grow, the reasoning provided by the argument is completely suprious. As it never happens that a fact that is world wide adopted for years turn out to be false, it is as good as syaing that the speed of light which is considered all around the world suddenly is proved wrong. Even though scientist such as Albert Einstein did their experiments by assuming something, people around them were not able to understand these experimental results, and were not able to even able to appereciate it at that time. But the facts stood by themself even if their perpetuator where not there.
However it is possible that a few information that is considered as a fact may be proven wrong by further development in time. For example, it was previously considered that the smallest unit of matter was an atom, but with further improvement in technology, we were able to find out that there were three more particles electrons, protons and neutrons, but not the latest techonology have made it possible to see several more partices in an atom, this group of particles is called particle kindom. Thus it is certainly possible that a fact may be proved wrong but that does't imply that we should not take any fact at its face value. There can be a possibility that facts may change but the new discoveries will lead to development of further more facts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...sy to get any type of information, from any where around the globe. We have always relied...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...be mistrusted as it may be proven wrong in future. The reason stated that the most of the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 708, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...e congruency of triangles etc. they are have been accepted as facts. They have easil...
^^^^
Line 2, column 895, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y turn out to be false in future is mere stupidity. Science has alway move ahead...
^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'moved'.
Suggestion: moved
... is mere stupidity. Science has alway move ahead by making mistakes, this is a ver...
^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
... part of moving forward with respect to any thing. If we dont take a peice of information...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...orward with respect to any thing. If we dont take a peice of information as fact and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...As it never happens that a fact that is world wide adopted for years turn out to be false,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...As it never happens that a fact that is world wide adopted for years turn out to be false,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... if their perpetuator where not there. However it is possible that a few information t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...t there. However it is possible that a few information that is considered as a fac...
^^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little information'.
Suggestion: little information
...t there. However it is possible that a few information that is considered as a fact may be pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 499, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...of particles is called particle kindom. Thus it is certainly possible that a fact ma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, in general, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 47.0 19.5258426966 241% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2586.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 564.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58510638298 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59085692594 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43085106383 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 815.4 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.698044696 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.105263158 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6842105263 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348507020788 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12649302336 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115167277437 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232812194245 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108334155004 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 12.1743820225 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.