Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
learning is a continuous process in which anyone can learn from any views that they see. The statement raises the controversial issue of whether we can usually learn much more from people whose view we share than those whose views contradict our own views because disagreement can cause pressure and resist learning. Nevertheless, some peoples learn from the views of other peoples that the views do not contradict with their opinion. however, I disagree with the claim and the reason presented in the statement, because most of the people learn more from the views of disagreement.
First of all, we can merely get some information from the views of other peoples that the views fully agree with our own views, but we cannot learn sufficient things from it as we can learn from the people whose views contradict with own views. when we argue with someone at any contents, the opponent gives a counter logic to defend his opinion; consequently, we have to give other persuasive logic to defend the counter logic of the opposition. thus, we not only learn the positive views of the issue, but it enables us to learn all the things of the issue including positive and negative consequence and also shape our knowledge. To illustrate, let us look at the example of national debate competition on the impact of 5g Cellular network on the environment. Before debate competition, we only know that the technology will give us an opportunity to get high-speed data communication on the mobile phone, and we can monitor all things such as houses, garden and etc through the network. after debate competition, we, however, learned the effects of high frequency, which will be used in 5g networks, on the human body, and we now concern about all the aspects of the network.
Moreover, when we study any things in our academic courses, we only memorize the information that doesn’t contradict with our mind, and thus, we forget the information after some period of time. most of the time, our mind save the information that we learn through the argument because our brain has to work more with contradicting issue. we cannot remember any phenomenon that happened in our life if the phenomenon merely happened in our life without contradiction. thus, we learn most of the things through any issues that disagree with our views.
Admittedly, the argument view is true only when it comes to the specific cases that a disagreement can cause stress which resists us to think freely about many things, and thus, perception capability of us deteriorate. however, most of the knowledge we can achieve through the issue of disagreement because our brain does a huge task on the views which is contradicted with our own view.
In conclusion, although we can learn from any things that we face in our real life, we can learn more from the people whose view contradict with our own view than those views that does not contradict with our views.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | iRohan | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | sushil koirala | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | priit | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | vishucology | 50 | view |
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 54
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 55
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 66
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o 66
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 37
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Learning
learning is a continuous process in which anyone...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... do not contradict with their opinion. however, I disagree with the claim and the reas...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... whose views contradict with own views. when we argue with someone at any contents, ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...nd the counter logic of the opposition. thus, we not only learn the positive views o...
^^^^
Line 2, column 992, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...es, garden and etc through the network. after debate competition, we, however, learne...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s, we forget the information after some period of time. most of the time, our mind save the in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
... information after some period of time. most of the time, our mind save the informat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... to work more with contradicting issue. we cannot remember any phenomenon that hap...
^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ened in our life without contradiction. thus, we learn most of the things through an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny issues that disagree with our views. Admittedly, the argument view is true on...
^^^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...erception capability of us deteriorate. however, most of the knowledge we can achieve t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, as to, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88176352705 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68406482768 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414829659319 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8833793337 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.294117647 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3529411765 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.576188521861 0.243740707755 236% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219598598222 0.0831039109588 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192125292889 0.0758088955206 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.397849605675 0.150359130593 265% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184820061727 0.0667264976115 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.