Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Education is one of the pilars of our society. The future of humankind depends upon it, thus teachers really should look for the most efficient way to convey the knowledge. Recent scientific articles have proved that curiosity enables people to learn at a faster rate, making it easier to focus on the subject. Therefore, educators should plan the teaching material according to the interests and suggestions of the students, so that they can make them curious and thus encourage them to learn.
First, tailoring courses to the students' hobbies will increase their attention. Children are more involved and active when they are working on a topic they find amusing. Therefore, if teachers take these interests into account they could potentially allow kids to learn more easily and effectively. In addition, the world is rapidly changing with technologies, and most of the times the youth are the ones in closest contact with this evolution. This is why the shool kids are the best prepared people to raise awareness about the subjects that are gaining momentum. For instance, three years ago in my high-school some of my class-mates asked for coding classes, a professor agreed to teach us the basics. We are now able to write code, which has made us more competent in the job market.
Finally, some parents argue that the kids need to learn some basic topics. That it is crucial for children to learn Math, English and History even if they hate the subjects and they do not find them interesting. However, there are many ways to relate these courses with the students' interests. For example, if the students like basketball, a teacher could use the statistics of games to teach them math in a more engaging way. In the same manner, a good professor would take into account the interest of young girls in romances to suggest them to read pride and prejudice.
To sum up, all children should acquire the basic knowledge in specific topics, as the national agreed upon course content expresses. Nevertheless, there are many ways of delivering this content, and teaching in a way that makes students interesting would be very beneficial. If educators took the interest of students into account, children would be more motivated and thus they would learn in a better way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the closest'.
Suggestion: in the closest
...ost of the times the youth are the ones in closest contact with this evolution. This is wh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97905759162 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58379483005 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552356020942 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.670350481 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.105263158 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326065758593 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899381098637 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969884024695 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190587472785 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129269482833 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.