Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
This issue is a contentious one. Every side has its own strengths and weaknesses. But I agree with the statement that critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Expert in any field has worked from scratch and every expert, which was once a beginner, has toiled his days and nights to become an expert. Every expert is eligible to be called a pro in his/her respective field due to the knowledge they have, learning gained, researches were done, evidence collected, outcomes and results evaluated etcetera. And they too were critically examined when they were in the stage of learning, which made them learn a lot.
Now since the issue states that it is of little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. Only a person having knowledge in that respective field can critically judge since he has been through that phase during his time. Also, if suppose you are a new joiner in a company and work allotted to you needs to be critically examined or judged by an expert in that field, which is acceptable and justifiable since that person will be able to guide you what to do and what not do.
History is replete with a plethora of examples where many experts have established a niche for themselves in the past. For example, eminent personalities in the field of sports such as Sania Mirza, Kapil Dev, Sachin Tendulkar etcetera have brought laurels for our country by winning in their respective sport at the international level, making the country feel proud of them. If they are critically judging the work of the new sportsperson, then it will be of value since these people have themselves achieved and have put in their painstaking efforts to reach to this level. Their learning, advice, take away from every tournament etcetera will be very useful for the young people joining their field.
In India, people are ready to give free advice on any topic but how many of them actually make sense? Those people are the ones who are mocked by others behind their back. Only an expert in that specific field can actually make an accurate judgment since they know the exact statistics and data behind that. A person having a heart problem will visit a heart surgeon and not a choreographer who is not an expert in that field.
Thus the critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. In some cases, it should be logical and meaningful to be valued.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so, if suppose you are a new joiner in a company and work allotted to you needs t...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...who is not an expert in that field. Thus the critical judgment of work in any gi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, then, thus, as to, for example, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68080357143 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41033293115 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484375 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.056852105 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.368421053 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5789473684 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384416706172 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133477178773 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167343681422 0.0758088955206 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249100810537 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126407462567 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.