Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The topic raises the controversial issue of whether the deterring of students from chasing academic disciplines with small chances to succeed should be the university responsibility.
Although the universities first and foremost goal is regarding the student' success, they also are designed to unleash the young undergraduate's untapped potential. Educational institutions are responsible to nurture the growth of their learners and provide general education as well as high standard knowledge in particular fields.
Without a doubt, is the dream of every school at any level that its students to become outstanding and brilliant in the field they choose. Nevertheless, in many cases, universities are not fully able to discover the true potential of the newcomers in some cases due to the fact they are very young and still on the search of their own personality. Moreover, it is largely recognized the fact that one may find the biggest passion and true path to success while studying a secondary area.
At this stage, it should be pointed out the definition of success can be different for each of us. If one understands his success through the level of wealth and comfort or by achieving a high social position then the field of study would become less important. On the same path but in the slight disparate direction it is known that when it comes to the less fortunate categories of people, younger are bound to take care of the financial stability of their families. While the might be not so brilliant in the field, they can perform well at the job and be happy with their choice.
Last but not least, keeping the students on the safe, narrow road of chosen area, which can offer them the greatest probability of success, will definitely void in their mind any courage to try anything they think are not good at. Upon this ground, it has been undoubtedly proved that errors and failures are one of the vital parts in personal development.
However, the above arguments do not constitute sufficient support to claim that the universities should leave the student future success to be met through lucky serendipity. From the educational point of view, having exceptional students in a certain field brings them a desired high rank among other universities.
Having considered both parts of the argument, it should be concluded that the best approach for a university would be to pilot their students guiding them to discover how to link their studies with their meaning of success.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, still, then, well, while, in particular, as well as, in many cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04830917874 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78886257102 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562801932367 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4792007309 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 5.21951772744 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152382035558 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488015788597 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362031132792 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747968354023 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231964472516 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.