Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The issue states that educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. I am not completely convinced with this statement. There are pros and cons of implementing this idea.
From annual report card of individual students, institutes can analyze data and give a feedback on the individual student’s strong points and weak points. Based on which students will be able to identify their strong and weak subjects. This is very much beneficial to know one’s strong and weak subject areas. But they should be given chance to improve score in upcoming examinations. In childhood it is very difficult to say that which field of study is destined for which individual. So primary and upperprimary education system should not be authorized to judge a children’s future fields of study. Children become interested in every field including sports. So it will be hard to judge his future fields of study based on his interest. On the contrary high schools can foresee a individual student’s future fields of study. Because in this age students become more weighted towards a particular field and tend to get success in that field of study. Most of the students start to think about their fields of study from this age. So at this time it is a responsibility for educational institutions to council their students about their fields of study. But most of the time educational institutes judge students based on their marks in a particular subject. This is a malpractice, because many other factors can reduce marks in the subject other than the student’s interest in that subject. So high schools should consider the marks of the subjects for 6-8 years and analysis that data based on some software and then give the conclusion about the success rate of individual student in pursuing a particular fields of study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and cons of implementing this idea. From annual report card of individual st...
^^
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n the contrary high schools can foresee a individual student's future fields...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ursuing a particular fields of study.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14012738854 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94012524975 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46178343949 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8426948783 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25165361301 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923289712969 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125887394348 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286230240945 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104694990965 0.0667264976115 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.