Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Education is an important part of one’s life. Educational institutions like schools, colleges provide not only academics skills but also social skills. In the present scenario, with the increase in the unemployment rate, encouraging students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful seems to be a good solution but it is just an illusion that belies the true essence of learning. The very fundamentals of term education do not restrict one to learn or choose a skill just because of increasing jobs in the field.
A student should not be forced to choose any specific field as the future is unpredictable as the fields that have plenty of jobs in the present might not be relevant in the future. For example, in the IT sector, various fields such as Software Development, Web development has plentiful jobs due to which a lot of engineering aspirants move towards these fields but with the rise in Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing, this trend has declined and the jobs are more or less equally partitioned. Hence, it is important to understand that choosing a specific field due to a greater number of jobs available is illogical.
Rather than encouraging students to choose a specific field of study, educational institutions should aid the students to enhance their creativity. Creativity is the key skill that transitions aspirant from an average level to an innovator. One could not expect innovations in different fields of study if students are restricted to only certain fields. The abate in creativity brings normality and uniformity within the students, which is often discouraged. Taking the example of Elon Musk, who brought various innovations such as autonomous vehicles, cost-saving satellites and rockets in the fields which were unheard of in the previous years. This is a precursor to a better future and scientific research.
Other than this, one does not have to take up a job. A student might pursue sports such as football, cricket etc. as a career. Also, e-sports have a gargantuan market which beats several big businesses in market cap. Hence, a student should be allowed to pursue their fields of interest. Considering a situation that if students are forced to a specific field of study, the competition for the jobs would increase and the unemployment rate would still increase to a great extent.
In conclusion, students indeed need to be in touch with the IT-sector demands but the idea of forcing them to pick only a specific field is rife with fallacies. Students should be allowed to pick any field of interest and the education institutions should help the students to carve a niche for success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...relevant in the future. For example, in the IT sector, various fields such as Software...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... are restricted to only certain fields. The abate in creativity brings normality and unif...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... students to carve a niche for success.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, more or less, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06108597285 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88322741872 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488687782805 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7205379792 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.523809524 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288992269633 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837121062266 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626775550324 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171029246008 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242893256867 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.