Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational institutions should inform their students about the relationship between certain fields of study and the associated career earnings. At the same time, educational institutions should inform students of the non-monetary value of different career paths, and their associated fields of study. Earning potential is only one dimension of what constitutes a fulfilling career. Therefore, schools would be foolish to actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
A functioning economy with a productive and engaged workforce requires jobs that are generally not lucrative. Journalist and nurses, are just two examples among a myriad of jobs that add incredible value to society, but do not necessarily pay the most. It was journalists that broke the Watergate Scandal, informed society that the average life-span of a NFL player is a meager 56 years and disseminated research showing that repeated concussions are likely to blame, and that exposed presidential candidate Donald Trump’s vulgar attitude towards women through capturing and releasing a video recording from 2005. In each case, and in many more instances, journalist have been instrumental in informing the public on major societal issues. Nurses, similarly, do not typically have lucrative careers, yet society would be non-functional without them. The school nurse diagnoses and cares for a child with the flu. A scrub nurse, ensures that all of the surgeons instruments are sterilized and organized so that the operation can be effective, efficient, and without complications. The emergency room nurse can often determine when something insidious might be occurring in a patient through their education and attentiveness. In spite of their less than stellar salaries, nurses are absolutely critical to keeping a functioning society healthy, which is a prerequisite for being productive.
Some might argue that urging students to pursue a lucrative carrer only stands to benefit the students. Furthermore, that if a student studies for a field that will earn them a lot of money, they are ensuring a good return on investment for their education. The problem with this type of thinking is two fold: it will result in people in careers that they are not impassioned with and well suited for, and it if every student goes into finance, for example, then due to basic supply and demand, the earning potential of that postion will decreased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d society that the average life-span of a NFL player is a meager 56 years and dis...
^
Line 3, column 947, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...th the flu. A scrub nurse, ensures that all of the surgeons instruments are sterilized and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
... earning potential of that postion will decreased.
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251162790698 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.146511627907 0.157235817809 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0906976744186 0.0880659088768 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0488372093023 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0325581395349 0.0444667217837 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125581395349 0.12292977631 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0441860465116 0.0406280797675 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96217666427 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0186046511628 0.030933414821 60% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0906976744186 0.0997080785238 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0279069767442 0.0249443105267 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0186046511628 0.0148568991511 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2480.0 2732.02544248 91% => OK
No of words: 386.0 452.878318584 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.42487046632 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.424870466321 0.366273622748 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.339378238342 0.280924506359 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.246113989637 0.200843997647 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.186528497409 0.132149295362 141% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96217666427 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 219.290929204 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60103626943 0.48968727796 123% => OK
Word variations: 72.613110881 55.4138127331 131% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 24.125 23.380412469 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0633019631 59.4972553346 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 141.124799967 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 23.380412469 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 58.0628238342 51.4728631049 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.84693877551 1.64882698954 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445285610595 0.391690518653 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120532675825 0.123202303941 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.133210981226 0.077325440228 172% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.481538850325 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166869020909 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163751474293 0.161403998019 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888348012608 0.0892212321368 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.332150434296 0.385218514788 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0709354100098 0.0692045440612 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330259783952 0.275328986314 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04655635798 0.0653680567796 71% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.