Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position
The policy of that educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed is a contetious one. While some may say that the application of this policy will allow students to reduce their probability of making a mistake when they choose thier career, I disagree with it because it is not guarranted that the educational institution will advice accordly. Moreover, this could cause a loss in student freedom. I what follows I will explain my position.
To begin, it is well known that Educational Institutions have all the infraestructure to know which students aptitudes are and how to guide them in the best direction. This direction, according to the policy, will be dissueade them from pursuing fields in which they can fail. However, there is not guarrante that this policy could be successful. For instance, in my personal case, I took a psychological test when I started my high school. According to it, my grades in maths were bad and the proffesional recomended my parents that I have troubles with maths so it would be a good choice to change my career of technician for a humanity career. However, thanks to my parent support, I was able to deal with the maths challange and I become into a nuclear engineer. This would not have been possible if I had followed the psychological test.
In addition, there is another problem with this policy which is releated with the reduction of students freedom. When someone say that you cannot follow certain career because you will not probably succeed in, he/she is restraining your free will of choose the career you want. Of course that any avise would be helpful, but it has to be taken just like a simply recomendation. Educational institutions should not do this by force. It is the student who has the final decision.
Nevertheless, I believe to that eduactional institutions have to guide the student but only in the High School. Once the student has entered to Collegue, the success is up to him or she.
To conclude, I consider that this policy could be benefical only if it did not restrain students free will by force because nobody can predict the future and nobody can know with career will be the best for a certain student without any doubts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
...d that the educational institution will advice accordly. Moreover, this could cause a ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84871794872 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79035744566 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484615384615 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.011760763 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5263157895 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242088928545 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803822333871 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10539481286 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137631233415 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849489725634 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.