Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Education is the holistic development of an invidual through electronic or oral mediums. In my opinion, education should be based on what students want included in the curriculum but at the same time follow some standards of quality check so that knowledge can be imparted in an impartial manner. Otherwise, the education system is bound to collapse. Designing the syllabus for a certain subject at a certain level in a mammoth task. Educators should keep in mind the learning accumen of students and then focus on the difficulty level.
A good way to achieve this would be to find out what the students want to learn. For example, a person interested in astronomy would like to have mathematics as a base subject so that it is easy for him to transition. The curriculum would suit his requirements and he will be able to start his career early. The only reason we study is to gain employment and such a curriculum would enable him to have a focused path towards kickstarting his career. Complimentary courses in physics would enable him to understand concepts of astronomy better.
The less time spent on eductaion more is the money saved. If the students know exactly what they want to study and if the educators can offer such courses, one can finish studies in time saving money by not taking foundation sujects. For instance, if a student wants to pursue biochemical engineering, the educators should make sure that subjects such as history or economics are not offered. Related courses on biotechnology would serve the purpose and the course duration would be shortended from 4 years to 3 years saving considerable amount of time, effort and energy.
However, this should only be done at the college or university level. For junior classes in school, it is imperative that all students should have the basic knowledge of quantitaive and logical subjects as well as social sciences. Some amount of moral educationa and sports will boost the overall personality of the child at the primary stages of study. If the child does not know the basics of any subject, then how can we expect him/her to select the future course of study?
Moreover, such children will lack critical thinking skills which is required in every stage of life. In addition, the students may become narrow minded if they are not taught various sujects till the senior secondary level.
Hence, educators should take the opinion of students, teachers and parents to devise a curriculum based on the needs of students. This can be vetted by other professionals in the industry so that there is no loss to be borne by the students and a proper standard for education level is in place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an impartial manner" with adverb for "impartial"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...check so that knowledge can be imparted in an impartial manner. Otherwise, the education system is bou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90066225166 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68636098415 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532008830022 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2693480795 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.909090909 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5909090909 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172979358683 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501279714137 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422461878516 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088065243058 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03173756127 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.