Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In the given statement, the author argues that student should be made to study ideas, trends, concepts which help in understanding the fact before teaching the fact by the educators. Facts are generally made up of the trends, ideas and concepts but it is not true that for learning the facts, concepts and ideas related to it should be studied. Facts can be understood even without knowing the generalised concepts related to it. So, I completely disagree with the authors statement.
Most of times, it occurs that the behind a simple fact there is a lengthy and complex concepts. why should one study such a complex concepts for a fact? So, it is better that the student study the fact first and if require he/she should be taught the concept, ideas and the trends related to it. Studying the fact takes less time as well as can be understood quickly rather than the concepts which takes long time and may need someone to teach them. Studying fact helps in getting more knowledge in the same time than studying the ideas behind it.
Moreover, it happens that the fact is important for the student i.e. related to his/her branch of study but the concepts are far from the academic discipline of the student. So it can be argued that the what can the student will get by studying such concepts and trends? It will just be the wastage of the valuable time. So it is better to just go ahead with the facts. Sometime it is also possible that there is no idea, trend or concept behind some fact they are merely theoretical. So, the emphasize the author puts on fact is quiet hard.
In some facts, the concepts are from some other branch or of some other subject which student had never studied or even would not in future. So, studying such things is of no importance and would not give knowledge. Even teaching such concepts to the students will give nightmare to the educators. There will be just the wastage of knowledge of the educator as the students are need to taught from the start which they could not due to the time constraint. For example, the fact is that, the light propagates through a large distance if there is no hindrance. It is not necessary that student should be taught the whole theories related to light propagation just to teach this fact. It is better to understand only the fact.
However, in some cases there occurs a need to have the knowledge of concepts or trend to study the facts. In such cases the teachers should give equal importance to the fact as well as the concepts, ideas or facts behind that. For example, for studying the atmosphere of different planets one should study about thing related to universe or the places of planets in the solar system because there exist the need to understand the concept clearly before studying it.
So, it can be concluded that in some cases there is a need to study the concepts, ideas and trends related to the facts but it is not required every time. So it cannot be stated that the educators should teach concepts, trends and ideas before teaching the facts. It should be given up to the educators what to teach and when because it will differ in every fact whether concepts should be taught or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the given statement, the author argue...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... it. So, I completely disagree with the authors statement. Most of times, it occurs...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the times') or simply say ''Most times''.
Suggestion: Most of the times; Most times
...isagree with the authors statement. Most of times, it occurs that the behind a simple fac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Why
...here is a lengthy and complex concepts. why should one study such a complex concept...
^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'concept'?
Suggestion: concept
...ts. why should one study such a complex concepts for a fact? So, it is better that the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e fact they are merely theoretical. So, the emphasize the author puts on fact is quiet hard. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ent had never studied or even would not in future. So, studying such things is of no impo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2628.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61862917399 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32861292544 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.353251318102 0.4932671777 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 786.6 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0853003623 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8571428571 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3214285714 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244476177152 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853607657807 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500221364577 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161239191525 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394535464567 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.38706741573 81% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.