The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Effectiveness of a leader cannot be measured simply on the basis of one parameter. Of course, well being of the citizens is one of the aspects, it is important to consider many other things before attributing leaders as effective. Again, the term "Well Being" has many strings attached to it. Health, employment, transport facilities, quality of living and many more amalgamate to decide the well being of people.
Let us sneak peak into the history and discuss about the most controversial leader the world has ever seen, Adolf Hitler. Nobody can doubt on the effectiveness of this yesteryear's ruthless leader. Under his leadership, country scaled heights in terms of development and became one of the strongest nations. However, it was his rigidity and stubbornness, that led to the downfall of Germany. Had he been resilient in his approach to tackle foreign affairs, Germany would not have been handed a defeat in second world war.
Coming to present day, no other leader can exemplify effectiveness as profoundly as the US President, Barack Obama. He has been exceptional in framing as well as executing policies of the country. His approach to shield the people from terrorism has been impeccable. Citizens are not only safe in the country, but their health and other needs are also given utmost importance. It might be wrong to credit only one leader for all the developments that have happened in America. In fact, it has been a continuous effort of all the leaders who have come into power since the inception of the country.
To sum, yes, well being of people is an important factor while measuring effectiveness of leaders. But, it can't be the sole tool of measurement. It is also an individual's responsibility to take care of himself. Leaders cannot be made accountable for each and every action of theirs. Government can build laws and policies, that will act for the prosperity of citizens. Onus is on the people to make the most out of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: SNEAK_PEAK[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sneak peek' (=preview)?
Suggestion: sneak peek
...ide the well being of people. Let us sneak peak into the history and discuss about the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...obody can doubt on the effectiveness of this yesteryears ruthless leader. Under his ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...uring effectiveness of leaders. But, it cant be the sole tool of measurement. It is ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...uring effectiveness of leaders. But, it cant be the sole tool of measurement. It is ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...sole tool of measurement. It is also an individuals responsibility to take care of himself....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in fact', 'of course', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253298153034 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.153034300792 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0738786279683 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0501319261214 0.0497285424764 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0448548812665 0.0444667217837 101% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121372031662 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0554089709763 0.0406280797675 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85831580496 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0290237467018 0.030933414821 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0844327176781 0.0997080785238 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0211081794195 0.0249443105267 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0105540897098 0.0148568991511 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1970.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 331.0 452.878318584 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95166163142 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350453172205 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253776435045 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196374622356 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126888217523 0.132149295362 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85831580496 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 219.290929204 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570996978852 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 62.9319660563 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.7619047619 23.380412469 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6253932295 59.4972553346 45% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8095238095 141.124799967 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7619047619 23.380412469 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.674092028746 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 41.1395482664 51.4728631049 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.73404255319 1.64882698954 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487889763264 0.391690518653 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.098738328034 0.123202303941 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0603043441769 0.077325440228 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.496881554179 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0938232772446 0.149214159877 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188505414477 0.161403998019 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741717603371 0.0892212321368 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.368397320786 0.385218514788 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0608596524095 0.0692045440612 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.354737787643 0.275328986314 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279999209194 0.0653680567796 43% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.