Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Laws, created and carried out to make a society a safe and just place for its people, require individuals to sacrifice portions of their free wills and to obey social needs. As none of human creations is perfect, however, it is also the responsibility of people to adjust and fix misleading principles and regulations. Under certain circumstances, thus, legal system demands its participants to detect unjust laws and improve them. Although there is no consensus made on what the definition of an ‘unjust’ law is yet, assuming that sufficient discussion and mutual agreement among citizens preceded, one has a responsibility to disobey unjust laws to call for justice.
Above all, refusing to obey rules is the most efficient tool for common citizens to persuade the society's legislative departments and representatives. For a power to abolish or revise unjust laws is solely given to a legislative branch in most of the modern day democratic countries, it is individuals’ responsibility to find and utilize a mean to force the legislatives to head to the right direction. For sure, disobeying schemes of the public would warn the legislatives that the legal system must be enhanced to be sustained.
In addition to that, when a mass of individuals refuse to obey unjust laws, it will prevent the government from punishing the violators of the laws, or at least make the government to think twice before punishing them. When there is a small group of people resisting, it is easy for the government to shut their ears and try to silence the voice of the minorities by castigating. When there are a majority of people speaking against unjust laws, however, it would be their best interest to listen to the voice of the people to compromise.
As stated above, there are many reasons for one to believe that revolting against laws is not only a right, but also a responsibility for individuals. In the light of these considerations, it is apparent that living in a democratic society as an individual companies a duty to disobey and resist unjust laws, along with a duty that is known more widely, which is to obey just laws.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'majorities'?
Suggestion: majorities
...rities by castigating. When there are a majority of people speaking against unjust laws,...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'at least', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.206467661692 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.176616915423 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.089552238806 0.0880659088768 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0398009950249 0.0497285424764 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0348258706468 0.0444667217837 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114427860697 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0373134328358 0.0406280797675 92% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.1250601906 2.79330140395 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0671641791045 0.030933414821 217% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0995024875622 0.0997080785238 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00995024875622 0.0249443105267 40% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0149253731343 0.0148568991511 100% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2147.0 2732.02544248 79% => OK
No of words: 359.0 452.878318584 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98050139276 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33147632312 0.366273622748 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.245125348189 0.280924506359 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186629526462 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136490250696 0.132149295362 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1250601906 2.79330140395 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 219.290929204 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526462395543 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 56.8416900026 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 29.9166666667 23.380412469 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2222889957 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.916666667 141.124799967 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9166666667 23.380412469 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 54.4292014856 51.4728631049 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.42574257426 1.64882698954 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431511125572 0.391690518653 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.163951893428 0.123202303941 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0810311066698 0.077325440228 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.680780149398 0.547984918172 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108345076343 0.149214159877 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217033283589 0.161403998019 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105807165159 0.0892212321368 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.44986565136 0.385218514788 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0938874796911 0.0692045440612 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327738353438 0.275328986314 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896807207308 0.0653680567796 137% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.