Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
Government officials, are the authorities particularly appointed to serve to the nation and its citizens. In order to run the state or any territory, officials have to take many decisions that may be sometimes too strict which is against the will of the citizen and sometimes according to the will of the citizen. For example, during any emergency, such as the pandemic, the government officials may take strict decision to impose rules and law that would not allow citizen to gather at any place and to remain at their home.
For instance, during corona pandemic, the leaders of various countries have imposed lockdown which restrict citizen from going out anywhere and also urge citizens to maintain social distancing. This however, affects the economy of the country and such decision was of course not in the favour of the ordinary citizen of any country. But, at the same time it was necessary from government officials of the respective country to take such harsh decision which are against the will of their citizens.
Apparently, if the government officials rely on the will of the citizen then it might make it difficult for the officials to take any judgment but they have to consider the will of the society in many scenarios. For example, if the government passes a law that would make the education free to every students of the country, then that law might be helpful and in favor to those who are impoverished and could not afford it but it would also affect the private universities and the schools staffs as their income rely solely on the paid institution. Hence, under such circumstances that law might bring imbalance to whole system. Therefore, sometimes the officials need to be calculated according to the will of the citizen.
In sum, it depends on the various scenarios whether the government officials should rely on will of the citizen or not. If the decision is for the betterment of the society as a whole then such decision should be taken without any consensus of the citizen but if decision is insular and providing advantage to the limited people then such decision should be taken along with the consensus of the citizen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 75 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ahasan | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ahasan | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | Soumyadip Kar 1729 | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 55
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 58
- Vandalism in Carlton County 58
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species 54
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88828337875 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65164478578 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430517711172 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6686662679 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5833333333 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.21951772744 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195064167652 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867492150976 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723730538081 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124567487685 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360033552938 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.