Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y

Essay topics:

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

When immediate problems occur, it tends to be urgent and crucial to the people, and governments should take action solving it. On the other hand, problems in the long-term, which might cause permanent harm to the nation, should also receive equal attention from the government. It should give no bias towards the two situations.

When short-terms problems occurred, such as natural disasters and diseases. The government should focus on the issue because if the emergencies cannot be solved, let alone solving long term issues. For example, after the 311 earthquake strikes Japan, the nuclear waste leak polluted the oceans and crops, and the tsunami destroyed thousands of houses and people. When facing those immediate problems, the Japanese government set aside all other issues in the nation, decreased fundings from other policies to support the damage caused by the earthquake to rebuild their home. Lots of nuclear experts joined to prevent nuclear water from dissipating in the ocean and farms. When facing such immediate problems, there is no doubt that governments should focus all their attention and resources to solve the problem.

On the other hand, a nation should also take care of its wildlife and environment, develop vaccines to prevent diseases and to plan solutions if there is an economic recession. Although we cannot see those efforts in public, they have significant potential to prevent future disasters. For example, in Taiwan, our government spends lots of money on providing health care and develop vaccines. Although some of the public thinks that its a waste of money to provide such affordable medical services, however, when a flew occurred in Taiwan, it can usually be easily destroyed and prevented in an early stage thanks to our well-established medical system. Therefore, governments focusing on long-term issue is also essential for preventing future problems.

While no one will doubt the government focusing on immediate issues, focusing on future anticipated issues is also essential and should be done simultaneously by the government because the governments have access to more information and advice from experts than its people. They have the responsibility to solve future problems even if its civilians doubted it. After all, we are a democratic society. The government should explain the reasons for solving future problems. Therefore, as a nation, we can prevent future problems while eliminating current ones.

Governments should focus on immediate and future problems, and no side should be preferred.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 403, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lth care and develop vaccines. Although some of the public thinks that its a waste of money...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 434, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...Although some of the public thinks that its a waste of money to provide such afford...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, after all, as to, for example, no doubt, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.435 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78376992584 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2193699743 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.7 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213690100613 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756626030313 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694025965101 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144483993255 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635573745953 0.0667264976115 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.