Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
It is said that governments in place of focusing on future problems should try to solve current problems. I agree with this problem to some extent.
On the one hand, each country has some current problems that should be solved. Solving these problems is a prerequisite for solving other problems in the future. For example, if the current problem of a country is the lack of facilities for its transport, the government should solve it first because in the future this problem becomes bigger. If today, their country does not have a good bus station or taxi, they should try to repair or renovate them because in future people will need other types of transportation such as the metro. If one of the current problems is having unsuitable roads for driving, they have to improve them for avoiding future problems such as road accidents. I believe that in the first step, governments should solve current and immediate problems because most of the time, solving current problems is one way of avoiding future problems. For instance, Nuclear agreement between countries is one of the current problems in modern life that by solving it countries can avoid Nuclear war in the future.
On the other hand, officials also should have a plan for future problems. For example, scientists believe that the earth's planet is no suitable place for living for another million years in the future. For this prediction, they try to find another planet for living such as Mars. Another example is the prediction of lack of fossil fuels that for solving it, officials try to use renewable energies including using the energy of wind, sun, and water. In other words, they want to replace renewable energies with fossil fuels for solving predicted future problems such as air pollution and the end of fuels. Therefore, consideration of future problems is also important.
To summarize, I believe that both current and future problems should be considered. However, the current problems should be solved first.
- A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow, specialized study of a single discipline. Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned. 50
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions? 83
- Governments are justified in circumventing civil laws when doing so is vital to the protection of national security? 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...or example, scientists believe that the earths planet is no suitable place for living ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 332.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01807228916 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55770249776 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436746987952 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3835353535 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373861736458 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166639910837 0.0831039109588 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124894025032 0.0758088955206 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281638242919 0.150359130593 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103079766914 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.