Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is stated in the claim that the government should concentrate on the current problems faced by the people rather than focusing on the solution for future problems. The government should solve the current problem of the people immediately without any delay. Otherwise, the people would suffer and their daily activity would be hampered. It may be required to anticipate the problem and find out the solution. However, what is the use of anticipating the problem and finding the solution without solving the current problems? Further, the anticipated problem would have prabability to occur. What if the problem would not occur? Therefore it is the responsibility of the government to solve the current problem immediately without any delay.
There are many examples in which the gvernment had tried to overlook the solution for the existing problem and figure out the solution of some other issues which would occur in the future. In 2014, Mumbai had faced sever drought in the peak summer. The people of Mumbai had faced problems even to get water for drinking. However, the Mumbai corporation did not find the solution to solve the problem. Instead, they focused on the storm water management for the comming monsoon which would solve the drought if it occur in the near future. Also, they focused on strom management to avoid the inundation of the citty with the predicted heavy rain. However, the corporation should think that what happens if there is enough rain in the mansoon? Moreover, the people of the city seeking the government to solve their water scarcity of the current situation. To respond their need, the government could have arranged water supply from nearby city or near by water body. So, it is important to look for solution to for the current problem rather than anticipating future problems and figure out the solution for that.
In an another example, the government of Kerala has focused on the prevention of Flu virus for the near future rather than providing support to the affected people. Huge population had been affected by the virus near Coachin and the government were reluctant to extent suport to the affected people. However, the government took preventive measure to avoid these kind of endemic diseases in near future. Because of which many people had lost their life. If the government had extended their help then they would have been prevented from the death.
Therefore, for the government the first priority would be solving the current problem of the people for their welfare. It is unlikely to occur the predicted future problem. Hence it is waste of time to work on that rather than solving current issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 631, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r. What if the problem would not occur? Therefore it is the responsibility of the governm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'occurs'?
Suggestion: occurs
...oon which would solve the drought if it occur in the near future. Also, they focused ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 946, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...ranged water supply from nearby city or near by water body. So, it is important to look...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'an example' or 'another example'.
Suggestion: an example; another example
...figure out the solution for that. In an another example, the government of Kerala has focused o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...rnment took preventive measure to avoid these kind of endemic diseases in near future. Bec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ind of endemic diseases in near future. Because of which many people had lost their lif...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... which many people had lost their life. If the government had extended their help ...
^^
Line 6, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... to occur the predicted future problem. Hence it is waste of time to work on that rat...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat rather than solving current issues.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03167420814 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51240854957 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400452488688 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6480902334 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5384615385 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30464977784 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992363151943 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656568396965 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197381025223 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065272860742 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.