People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The given statement states that the decisions based on emotion would ultemately be a poor decision. It is true that the people offten forced to take the decision when they fight with others and they go on justify that the decisions what they took with logic. However, later the consequence because of the decision would prove them that the decision is wrong. In the field such as cinema, cricket, and business critics always make their own judgement on the movement of the famous personality. It is very important for the famous personality to not to react to the critics. If they react and make decision based on their judgement, it would end up as a poor decision. Instead, the famous personality should work to prove the critics are wrong.
The emotion which is the dangereous tool makes the people to take the immediate decission. As stated in the introduction, most of the people react to the critics. They don't understand that the job of the critics is to make judgement, instead peopl take it as personal. To overcome those critics they offten take the immidiate decision. In addition, they try to prove that the decision is based on logic to their friends and family member who cares about the decision makers. Later, the consequence of those decision would make them realize that it is poor decision. For example, the famous sports person Virendra Shewag had been criticised for his poor performance in cricket. The poor performance is due to his lack of fitness. He reacted to the crtics and decided to retire from the all format of the cricket immediately. However, i would say that it is poor decision and it came out from the emotion. I thought he should made him fit and prove the critics that he can excell in the cricket. Also, it would be insipartion to the younger crickters.
In addition, the people who does not react to thei own emotion would always fetch success in their life. For example, the famous actor Mr. Vijay had face many failure durin 2010 to 2014. All of his films did not go well in that period. Most of the critics judged him as not fit for the acting hereafter. The actor did not react to the critics. Rather, he proved the critics that he can excell again in the film industry by giving successive hit in 2015. From this we can say that he did not take any decision when he is in emotion which fetch him a great success.
On the whole we can say that, the people who are so calm when they are in emotion can avoid taking wrong decision. However, people who take decision in emotion would finaly proven to be wrong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f the people react to the critics. They dont understand that the job of the critics ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... poor decision. For example, the famous sports person Virendra Shewag had been critici...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 834, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...at of the cricket immediately. However, i would say that it is poor decision and ...
^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun failure seems to be countable; consider using: 'many failures'.
Suggestion: many failures
...le, the famous actor Mr. Vijay had face many failure durin 2010 to 2014. All of his films di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, it is true, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59388646288 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38646188328 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410480349345 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9774092945 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.1428571429 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3571428571 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 20.0 5.13820224719 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265272271272 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746540920745 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073926366662 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174272624696 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697666948414 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.