Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Though ‘To teach is our duty, To be educated is our right’, it’s irrational to expect education always comes free. Especially, academic institutions, akin to any other business, requires funding which could be retrieved from public resource or from the students themselves. Thus, the overarching question here is: ‘When would be the best circumstances for college and university to afford waiving of all tuition fee’. From my perspective, we could examine the issue by using the reference from developing and developed country as the economic development on a nation impose great impact on educational funding.
As challenging as any other fields, education in developing country, indubitably, is constantly being plagued with financial issue due to the meager budget support from the public sector. With its limited national resources, most of these countries would rather focus their resource on investment with higher return such as trading and industrializing. That being said, yearly supply for most schools in low-income nations may only be sufficient to cover daily operation cost. More severely, in countries as Philippines, Miama, and Cambodia, the youth from rural provinces continue to suffer from ill-educated situation from even elementary level. If there does exists any form of extra funding, it should be granted to solve this pressing issue of illiteracy instead of alleviating the financial issue for higher education. The statement would not make sense in this particular frame.
On the contrary, given the well-doing of economy, Government should definitely waive the education fee for college or university candidates as they are at helm for the national progress. Higher educational institutions, being the space where groundbreaking knowledge in science, technology, arts, philosophy are solidified, are essential for human civilization and innovation. With the absence of such academic contribution, probably, we would still believe the world is flat while living in the dark. Waiving the tuition fees for students would definitely spur up the admission rate of undergraduate and graduate students, among who, there might be the next Einstein or Newton. Thus, high-education should definitely be the priority considering the public resource is abundant enough to lavish.
In addition to attracting more prospective candidates, it helps to impede the miss-opportunity for potential talents who are not able to afford higher education on their own. Some might say the scholarship system could serve the same purpose. However, in majority of our education system, academic credential is one of the key scales to determine their eligibility yet genius might not necessary demonstrate great performance in school. We could examine the case of Thomas Edison, who was expelled by the school because of his gruesome merit, has become one of the greatest scientist of all time. If universities spread an open arm to all students, it would sure to capture as many brainiac individuals not only locally but internationally.
In summary, as I cogently elaborated above, the relevance of the statement is highly reliant on the availability of public funding. However, whenever the financial string is loose, higher-education should definitely be made gratuitous for the public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to waive'.
Suggestion: to waive
...es for college and university to afford waiving of all tuition fee'. From my persp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 631, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ergraduate and graduate students, among who, there might be the next Einstein or Ne...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, in addition, in summary, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2825.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61630218688 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11237160205 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58648111332 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 899.1 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8630478599 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.409090909 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8636363636 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126335025389 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373479536327 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304593871457 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718778973626 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242855278593 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 100.480337079 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.