Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
In a long list of governments' objectives all around the globe, improving the quality of education takes undeniable priority. Many democratic countries have abided by the right to education which recognizes a right to free, accessible primary education to all for the students of today are envisaged as the leaders and pioneers of tomorrow. This paves way for the provision of free college and university education to all students. However, I believe this is a quixotic thought which can potentially disrupt economy and defeat its own purpose.
It is incumbent on the government of a nation to enhance their global, social and economic status. Improvement in education system is one of the important steps in this path towards progress. However, making the college and university level education free could cause economic imbalance. Education at a higher level doesn't come at a meagre cost to the government. Educational institutes need to be equipped with state of the art infrastructure, laboratories, top quality faculties, maintenance and security which costs a tremendous amount of money. As a result, the government might have to compromise its budget on other subjects of national importance. If such facilities are made free, the government and it's policies would cripple as it would hinder the nations' progress in remaining part of the spectrum.
Moreover, chargeless college education would abate the education quality. Government bodies responsible for running educational institutes would tend to opt for inexpensive laboratories or sub par professors in order to curb the expenses. As a result, the research work which is considered to be the backbone of a college reputation, would suffer. Students might lose interest due to the professors' incompetence. Under these circumstances, the move might prove to be adverse for a growing nation.
Admittedly, one might argue that free college education would prove to be a fair system as it would open the gates for a larger proportion of the population. It would undeniably be extremely beneficial for those who couldn't afford education before. But the cost of free education would be too great for the government. The officials would tend to cut the expenses degrading the quality of education. Providing scholarships is a great way to acknowledge deserving students who can't afford education.
In sum, the argument to provide free college and university education to all seems to be quite far-fetched. It would cause slow but grave economic imbalance as well as defeat it's own purpose being detrimental to the education system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... imbalance. Education at a higher level doesnt come at a meagre cost to the government...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...nal institutes need to be equipped with state of the art infrastructure, laboratories, top quali...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...Students might lose interest due to the professors incompetence. Under these circumstances...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...y be extremely beneficial for those who couldnt afford education before. But the cost o...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 477, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y to acknowledge deserving students who cant afford education. In sum, the argume...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 12.9106741573 256% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33902439024 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05322700138 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1250058105 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1739130435 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8260869565 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.65217391304 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293785760162 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952300522519 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099959793463 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18578537787 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714255847878 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.