Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

There are many students have will to study but lack in resources as well as funds to study. However, there are many students who are lacking in funds to study and just want to complete their degree.The prompt suggest that any student enrolled in an university who cannot afford the tuition. The education for them should be free. I mostly agree with the prompt for following two reasons.

The decision to whether waive off the complete tuition of a student who cannot afford the tuition fee should be assesed throughly before implementing. A students capabilities should decide whether the university should free the education cost of that particular student. For instance, a student who has sufficient knowledge about a subject and is pursuing his further studies to master in that subject. The university should take in consideration his or her capabilites and provide with a waiver. If the student is profound enough to be worthy of free tuition should be provided with a waiver. consider that if the student is brilliant and is lacking of enough resources to practice his subject and proves that he should be provided with free tuition, the university should give the student a free education. Thus, complete assesment should be conducted before a university provides with free education.

Secondly, a student who enrolled in university who has less than average knowledge about a subject but cannot afford the tuition fee and has very less intrest in that subject, who shows no signs of improvement should not be provided with free education. Here, assesment of student before providing him with free education is much important. If not assesed properly and university has a limit on the number of student they can provide with a free education, might have adverse effect on the student who is capable of free education. For instance, two students who cannot afford the tuition, Adam and Jack, where Adam is less interested in the subject and just wants to complete his degree and Jack who is proficient in his studies and wants to achieve high goals in his field. The university if not asseses properly both the students and provides Adam with free education will have an negative effects on university as well as Jack because the university has limited funds to provide students free tuition and will loose out with a deserving candidate. Therefore, universities should properly assess student before providing with free education.

However, some might argue that every student who is not able afford the tuition should be provided with free education. This approach can have negative effects on the university. Therefore universities should properly assess among the students for deserving candidates and should provide them with free education.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... and just want to complete their degree.The prompt suggest that any student enrolle...
^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...pt suggest that any student enrolled in an university who cannot afford the tuitio...
^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... capabilites and provide with a waiver. If the student is profound enough to be wo...
^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consider
...ition should be provided with a waiver. consider that if the student is brilliant and is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 882, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ides Adam with free education will have an negative effects on university as well ...
^^
Line 9, column 1015, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... provide students free tuition and will loose out with a deserving candidate. Therefo...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ave negative effects on the university. Therefore universities should properly assess amo...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2319.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15333333333 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66717495156 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.373333333333 0.4932671777 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7137172218 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.95 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296028662213 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130225665508 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617431526022 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228220194103 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263653807913 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.