Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
It is difficult to define the roles of government. However, one of roles that government should ensure to have is to support non-profitable national research business even though research business does not guarantee the success because scientific research cannot generate the conclusion that researchers expected; and its failure, which is even helpful for future studies, never be worthless. However, restrictions are necessary for particular research studies. Therefore, the government role for scientific research would be the management to provide general guidance for research studies and to support for its development.
Scientific studies should be restricted and prohibited to further study when it is unethical and not humanistic. For example, one of the most controversial study conducted in psychology, which is called Milgram study at Yale University, would be not possible to proceed because of its harmful consequences to the participants through the study. The research was to gain knowledge about the functions and roles of authority. The participants should listen to authority who directed them to punish the actors when the actors answered incorrectly. Even though the participants debriefed after study that the actors were not actually punished and just acted as they were in pain with the punishment beeps, the participants were shocked and suffered from their feeling of guilty even after considerable amount of times passed.
Likewise, Milgram study is a worthy to gain knowledge that we would like to have for social relationship with authority. However, it is unethical and should have been restricted by the government for psychological safety for the participants. Additionally, the government should limit studies that use harsh procedure to animals and alive things such as using harsh chemical given to animals or animal tests for human uses. Recently, by many environmentalists, many companies became aware of how unethical animal tests would be. Therefore, many products that used to test with animals started marking on it that they no longer test it with animals.
Rather restrict scientific research, the government should support it trusting scientists and scholars for human benefits. Scientific research in terms of costs is expensive. Only few people with strongly stable financial asset would be able to begin any projects. Eventually, any research studies that are privately done would worsen the gap between rich and poor because those expensive resources would be able to be accessible to rich. For example, if virus vaccine research is conducted by private research center or company, only those in higher socioeconomic class are likely to be vaccinated and avoid particular virus. Others in lower income class would be hard to even keep their health. Therefore, for general benefits for citizens, as one of government roles, they need to keep scientific research non-profitable as national business which eventually would be possible by supporting scientific researches rather than by restricting.
Another role of government that is relevant to by supporting research is to prepare any disasters that are predictive for scholars and scientists. The government should keep safe the nations and citizens by being aware of any possibly predictable disasters. Therefore, restriction of research provides obstacles to study such this type of information. For example, research scientists found that the issues with plastic in ocean have been deleterious with animal lives which eventually is connected to human health. Without research, we would not able to know what the next disaster is after abusing plastics and also regarding to the global warming brought frequently by environmental scientists.
Without specific reasons for potentially harmful and unethical studies, the government rather support research that scientists pursue for public bonification. Rather saving money from restricting studies, the government financially support it and create comprehensive manual of how to develop research/science and raise more talented and thoughtful scientists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...they no longer test it with animals. Rather restrict scientific research, the gover...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'restricts'.
Suggestion: restricts
... longer test it with animals. Rather restrict scientific research, the government sho...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...entists pursue for public bonification. Rather saving money from restricting studies, ...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore talented and thoughtful scientists.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, therefore, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3505.0 2235.4752809 157% => OK
No of words: 617.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68071312804 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98392262146 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03070922666 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468395461912 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1074.6 704.065955056 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9056217804 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.178571429 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0357142857 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266550734756 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875195284406 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777778809074 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154951762968 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675501721817 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 100.480337079 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.