The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Everyone is unique in this world with different abilities and perspectives which makes them great in their own way. The prompt suggests, the individuals greatness could be decided only after they are no more in the world, ignoring the contemporaries perspective during their time. I mostly disagree to the argument due to following three reasons.
Firstly, each individual in this world and born uniquely to give back to the society. Everyone has their own experience and talent nurtured during their lifetime which influences the people around. For instance, Albert Einstein, who is one of the most renowned scientist, was appreciated by people all around the world. It is not the individuals whose greatness are appreciated, but it is the talent that they show during the time. Due to which many followers as well as his contemporaries appreciated his work and followed his footmark on approaching the science. In addition, Stephen Hawkins was also a eminent scientist appreciated by the contemporaries while he was living and after his death. Therefore, people remember individual because of the greatness they reflected back to the society whether they be dead or alive.
Further, in twenty first century, contemporaries are no more considered rivals instead people working in the similar grounds work together to uplift each other. Moreover, people working in the same field inspire each other and motivate to accelerate their image with synergy. To illustrate this scenario, there are many movies made in collaboration with directors from different countries with different specialty. They respect each other and work together with motive to develop the whole field. Thus, making them being known even after they are no more in the world. In addition, we can see many Youtubers collaborating with other another spreading awareness. Promoting the contemporaries and themselves makes effective image among huge mass of people thus they are appreciated for the collaborated work.
Sometimes, however, people expect more and do not appreciate what they have around them. For example, people of Nepal were reluctance of their king during his regime. When the whole families were killed, people craved for the peaceful environment and discipline created by the royals. Before their death, people tend to flout the rules but later they realized the need for it. Also, nursing was not respected profession until they felt their need in the society due to war. They did not realize the greatness that Mother Terresa shared until people faced those scenarios themselves. To sum, in some scenarios, people only realize the greatness of an individuals once they are gone.
All in all, it is essential to appreciate the small task by the people as those baby steps could be the stepping stone for the next big task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...their own way. The prompt suggests, the individuals greatness could be decided only after t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'contemporaries'' or 'contemporary's'?
Suggestion: contemporaries'; contemporary's
... are no more in the world, ignoring the contemporaries perspective during their time. I mostly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... In addition, Stephen Hawkins was also a eminent scientist appreciated by the co...
^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
...her they be dead or alive. Further, in twenty first century, contemporaries are no more con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...ead or alive. Further, in twenty first century, contemporaries are no more considered ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2364.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24168514412 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74539254932 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534368070953 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3818119165 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.56 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.04 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179022095855 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552514753311 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03578960535 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111490152991 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555918865473 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.